[Nephrotic syndrome in minimal change disease (kidney), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and focal mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis].
Татьяна Сергеевна Вознесенская, Т. В. Сергеева
Abstract
Татьяна Сергеевна Вознесенская, Т. В. Сергеева
Abstract
AIM: To specify clinical and laboratory characteristics of minimal change disease (MCD), focal mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN), focal-segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 45 case histories of children (renal biopsy for nephrotic syndrome) has shown that morphologically 13 of them had MCD, 15--FSGS and 17--focal MPGN. Clinical, laboratory, immunofluorescent and electron microscopy findings typical for each of the morphological types were studied. RESULTS: The data obtained suggest that MCD, FSGS and focal MPGN may represent independent forms of glomerulonephritis. CONCLUSION: If a differential diagnosis by renal biopsy is difficult, information from the disease history and clinico-laboratory evidence should be used.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
AIM: To specify clinical and laboratory characteristics of minimal change disease (MCD), focal mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN), focal-segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 45 case histories of children (renal biopsy for nephrotic syndrome) has shown that morphologically 13 of them had MCD, 15--FSGS and 17--focal MPGN. Clinical, laboratory, immunofluorescent and electron microscopy findings typical for each of the morphological types were studied. RESULTS: The data obtained suggest that MCD, FSGS and focal MPGN may represent independent forms of glomerulonephritis. CONCLUSION: If a differential diagnosis by renal biopsy is difficult, information from the disease history and clinico-laboratory evidence should be used.
Key concepts: Minimal change disease, Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, Nephrotic syndrome, Medicine, Glomerulonephritis, Pathology, Renal biopsy, Differential diagnosis