1992PubMedRequires access

[Value and limits of the determination of aortic output by Doppler echocardiography in the quantification of aortic valve insufficiencies].

Christophe Tribouilloy, Anfani Mirode, A Marek, Rey Jl, P Avinée, Lesbre Jp

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the value and limitations of Doppler echocardiographic measurement of aortic flow in the quantification of aortic regurgitation. Sixty-one patients were examined by Doppler echocardiography within 48 hours of cardiac catheterisation. There were 9 Grade I, 18 Grade II, 18 Grade III and 16 Grade IV angiographic aortic regurgitations. The mean aortic blood flow in angiographic Grades I and II (p less than 0.01). A correlation was observed between Doppler aortic flow and the angiographic grade of regurgitation (r = 0.66, p less than 0.001) and between aortic flow and regurgitant fraction (r = 0.68, p less than 0.001). Aortic flow greater than 10 l/mn identified angiographic Grades III or IV regurgitation with a sensitivity and specificity of 73.5% and 92.5% respectively and a positive and negative predictive values of 92.5% and 73.5% respectively. Aortic regurgitation with a regurgitant fraction greater than 40% was identified by a pulsed Doppler aortic blood flow greater than 10 l/mn with a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 93% respectively, and positive and negative predictive values of 95% and 61% respectively. The sensitivity of this criterion is relatively poor as some severe aortic regurgitations have aortic flows of less than 10 l/mn: these patients have low outputs because of left ventricular dysfunction which is apparent from measurement of left ventricular fractional shortening.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of this study was to assess the value and limitations of Doppler echocardiographic measurement of aortic flow in the quantification of aortic regurgitation. Sixty-one patients were examined by Doppler echocardiography within 48 hours of cardiac catheterisation. There were 9 Grade I, 18 Grade II, 18 Grade III and 16 Grade IV angiographic aortic regurgitations. The mean aortic blood flow in angiographic Grades I and II (p less than 0.01). A correlation was observed between Doppler aortic flow and the angiographic grade of regurgitation (r = 0.66, p less than 0.001) and between aortic flow and regurgitant fraction (r = 0.68, p less than 0.001). Aortic flow greater than 10 l/mn identified angiographic Grades III or IV regurgitation with a sensitivity and specificity of 73.5% and 92.5% respectively and a positive and negative predictive values of 92.5% and 73.5% respectively. Aortic regurgitation with a regurgitant fraction greater than 40% was identified by a pulsed Doppler aortic blood flow greater than 10 l/mn with a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 93% respectively, and positive and negative predictive values of 95% and 61% respectively. The sensitivity of this criterion is relatively poor as some severe aortic regurgitations have aortic flows of less than 10 l/mn: these patients have low outputs because of left ventricular dysfunction which is apparent from measurement of left ventricular fractional shortening.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the value and limitations of Doppler echocardiographic measurement of aortic flow in the quantification of aortic regurgitation. Sixty-one patients were examined by Doppler echocardiography within 48 hours of cardiac catheterisation. There were 9 Grade I, 18 Grade II, 18 Grade III and 16 Grade IV angiographic aortic regurgitations. The mean aortic blood flow in angiographic Grades I and II (p less than 0.01). A correlation was observed between Doppler aortic flow and the angiographic grade of regurgitation (r = 0.66, p less than 0.001) and between aortic flow and regurgitant fraction (r = 0.68, p less than 0.001). Aortic flow greater than 10 l/mn identified angiographic Grades III or IV regurgitation with a sensitivity and specificity of 73.5% and 92.5% respectively and a positive and negative predictive values of 92.5% and 73.5% respectively. Aortic regurgitation with a regurgitant fraction greater than 40% was identified by a pulsed Doppler aortic blood flow greater than 10 l/mn with a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 93% respectively, and positive and negative predictive values of 95% and 61% respectively. The sensitivity of this criterion is relatively poor as some severe aortic regurgitations have aortic flows of less than 10 l/mn: these patients have low outputs because of left ventricular dysfunction which is apparent from measurement of left ventricular fractional shortening.

Key concepts: Medicine, Regurgitation (circulation), Cardiology, Regurgitant fraction, Internal medicine, Doppler echocardiography, Aortic valve, Hemodynamics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Value and limits of the determination of aortic output by Doppler echocardiography in the quantification of aortic valve insufficiencies]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens