1983•PubMedRequires access

Comparative stability of first, second and third generation cephalosporins and N-formimidoyl thienamycin against gram-negative beta-lactamases.

A. Vuye

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The susceptibility of cefamandole, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, moxalactam, and N-formimidoyl thienamycin to different gram-negative beta-lactamases was determined by the UV-spectrophotometric method and two microbiological techniques in comparison with that of first generation cephalosporins. In general, the microbiological methods were more sensitive than the UV-assay. Cefamandole was rapidly hydrolyzed by all enzymes tested. The beta-lactamase stability of the other compounds was significantly higher, but clearly proved to be not absolute. With the aid of the "double-disc technique", the most sensitive of the methods used, cefotaxime was shown to be susceptible to all enzymes, whereas cefoxitin, moxalactam and N-formimidoyl thienamycin showed some susceptibility to 6, 3 and 7 enzymes, respectively. Moxalactam appeared to be the most stable of the compounds tested.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The susceptibility of cefamandole, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, moxalactam, and N-formimidoyl thienamycin to different gram-negative beta-lactamases was determined by the UV-spectrophotometric method and two microbiological techniques in comparison with that of first generation cephalosporins. In general, the microbiological methods were more sensitive than the UV-assay. Cefamandole was rapidly hydrolyzed by all enzymes tested. The beta-lactamase stability of the other compounds was significantly higher, but clearly proved to be not absolute. With the aid of the "double-disc technique", the most sensitive of the methods used, cefotaxime was shown to be susceptible to all enzymes, whereas cefoxitin, moxalactam and N-formimidoyl thienamycin showed some susceptibility to 6, 3 and 7 enzymes, respectively. Moxalactam appeared to be the most stable of the compounds tested.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The susceptibility of cefamandole, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, moxalactam, and N-formimidoyl thienamycin to different gram-negative beta-lactamases was determined by the UV-spectrophotometric method and two microbiological techniques in comparison with that of first generation cephalosporins. In general, the microbiological methods were more sensitive than the UV-assay. Cefamandole was rapidly hydrolyzed by all enzymes tested. The beta-lactamase stability of the other compounds was significantly higher, but clearly proved to be not absolute. With the aid of the "double-disc technique", the most sensitive of the methods used, cefotaxime was shown to be susceptible to all enzymes, whereas cefoxitin, moxalactam and N-formimidoyl thienamycin showed some susceptibility to 6, 3 and 7 enzymes, respectively. Moxalactam appeared to be the most stable of the compounds tested.

Key concepts: Thienamycin, Moxalactam, Cefoxitin, Cefamandole, Chemistry, Cephalosporin, Cefotaxime, Latamoxef

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative stability of first, second and third generation cephalosporins and N-formimidoyl thienamycin against gram-negative beta-lactamases. — Research Paper | ScholarLens