1988PubMedRequires access

Dobutamine: a drug utilization evaluation.

Mutnick Ah, Souney Pf

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

During a recent fiscal year, a 243% increase in dobutamine costs--which were associated with increased drug use--was observed at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. As a result of this increase, a drug usage evaluation was concluded to determine: the indications for which dobutamine was being prescribed, whether or not dopamine could be used in place of dobutamine, and any anticipated cost savings realized by targeting dobutamine prescribing. Forty-six consecutive patients who were receiving dobutamine for hypotension, congestive heart failure, or decreased urine output were evaluated during a 3-month study period. The results indicated that dopamine could have been used as initial therapy in the majority of patients. In only 3 patients was dobutamine considered the drug of choice. Furthermore, the institution could have reduced drug costs by more than $50,000 if the use of dobutamine could have been reserved for its most appropriate indications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

During a recent fiscal year, a 243% increase in dobutamine costs--which were associated with increased drug use--was observed at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. As a result of this increase, a drug usage evaluation was concluded to determine: the indications for which dobutamine was being prescribed, whether or not dopamine could be used in place of dobutamine, and any anticipated cost savings realized by targeting dobutamine prescribing. Forty-six consecutive patients who were receiving dobutamine for hypotension, congestive heart failure, or decreased urine output were evaluated during a 3-month study period. The results indicated that dopamine could have been used as initial therapy in the majority of patients. In only 3 patients was dobutamine considered the drug of choice. Furthermore, the institution could have reduced drug costs by more than $50,000 if the use of dobutamine could have been reserved for its most appropriate indications.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

During a recent fiscal year, a 243% increase in dobutamine costs--which were associated with increased drug use--was observed at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. As a result of this increase, a drug usage evaluation was concluded to determine: the indications for which dobutamine was being prescribed, whether or not dopamine could be used in place of dobutamine, and any anticipated cost savings realized by targeting dobutamine prescribing. Forty-six consecutive patients who were receiving dobutamine for hypotension, congestive heart failure, or decreased urine output were evaluated during a 3-month study period. The results indicated that dopamine could have been used as initial therapy in the majority of patients. In only 3 patients was dobutamine considered the drug of choice. Furthermore, the institution could have reduced drug costs by more than $50,000 if the use of dobutamine could have been reserved for its most appropriate indications.

Key concepts: Dobutamine, Medicine, Heart failure, Drug, Anesthesia, Intensive care medicine, Internal medicine, Cardiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dobutamine: a drug utilization evaluation. — Research Paper | ScholarLens