2015•eYLS (Yale Law School)Open access

The Best for Last: The Timing of U.S. Supreme Court Decisions

Lee Epstein, William M. Landes, Richard A. Posner

Open full text 23 citations

Abstract

This Article investigates the hypothesis that the most important and, often, controversial and divisive cases-so called "big" casesare disproportionately decided at the end of June.We define a "big case" in one of four ways: front-page coverage in the New York Times; front-page and other coverage in four national newspapers (the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, and Chicago Tribune); the number of amicus curiae briefs filed in a case; and the number of subsequent citations by the Supreme Court to its decision in a case.We find a statistically significant association between each measure of a big case and end-of-term decisions even after controlling for the month of oral argument (cases argued later in the term are more likely to be decided near the end of the term) and

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This Article investigates the hypothesis that the most important and, often, controversial and divisive cases-so called "big" casesare disproportionately decided at the end of June.We define a "big case" in one of four ways: front-page coverage in the New York Times; front-page and other coverage in four national newspapers (the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, and Chicago Tribune); the number of amicus curiae briefs filed in a case; and the number of subsequent citations by the Supreme Court to its decision in a case.We find a statistically significant association between each measure of a big case and end-of-term decisions even after controlling for the month of oral argument (cases argued later in the term are more likely to be decided near the end of the term) and

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This Article investigates the hypothesis that the most important and, often, controversial and divisive cases-so called "big" casesare disproportionately decided at the end of June.We define a "big case" in one of four ways: front-page coverage in the New York Times; front-page and other coverage in four national newspapers (the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, and Chicago Tribune); the number of amicus curiae briefs filed in a case; and the number of subsequent citations by the Supreme Court to its decision in a case.We find a statistically significant association between each measure of a big case and end-of-term decisions even after controlling for the month of oral argument (cases argued later in the term are more likely to be decided near the end of the term) and

Key concepts: Supreme court, Newspaper, Law, Argument (complex analysis), Political science, Sociology, Chemistry, Biochemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Best for Last: The Timing of U.S. Supreme Court Decisions — Research Paper | ScholarLens