ScholarLens Back to search
1994•PubMedRequires access

[Comparison of HLA typing and retyping data in patients with bone marrow transplantation].

Alois Wolpl, Marie T. Fischer, T.H. Eiermann, Shraga F. Goldmann

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Comparing HLA data from 851 patients with serological HLA-A, -B, -DR and/or PCR-SSO HLA-DRB, -DQB reevaluated HLA types produced 107 (12.5%) different results. The high discrepancy of HLA data from patients confirm the demand for a serological HLA-A, -B and a DNA HLA-DRB, -DQB reevaluation before starting an unrelated donor search for bone marrow transplantation. The reliability of serological HLA-DRB, -DQB typing was evaluated as 97.8%, whereas DNA HLA-DRB, -DQB typing was 99.5%.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Comparing HLA data from 851 patients with serological HLA-A, -B, -DR and/or PCR-SSO HLA-DRB, -DQB reevaluated HLA types produced 107 (12.5%) different results. The high discrepancy of HLA data from patients confirm the demand for a serological HLA-A, -B and a DNA HLA-DRB, -DQB reevaluation before starting an unrelated donor search for bone marrow transplantation. The reliability of serological HLA-DRB, -DQB typing was evaluated as 97.8%, whereas DNA HLA-DRB, -DQB typing was 99.5%.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Comparing HLA data from 851 patients with serological HLA-A, -B, -DR and/or PCR-SSO HLA-DRB, -DQB reevaluated HLA types produced 107 (12.5%) different results. The high discrepancy of HLA data from patients confirm the demand for a serological HLA-A, -B and a DNA HLA-DRB, -DQB reevaluation before starting an unrelated donor search for bone marrow transplantation. The reliability of serological HLA-DRB, -DQB typing was evaluated as 97.8%, whereas DNA HLA-DRB, -DQB typing was 99.5%.

Key concepts: Serology, Human leukocyte antigen, Typing, Bone marrow transplantation, Histocompatibility Testing, Immunology, Tissue typing, Transplantation

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparison of HLA typing and retyping data in patients with bone marrow transplantation]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens