1996•PubMedRequires access

[Non-coordinated voiding syndrome: classification and urodynamic characterization].

M Rapariz González, Jesús Salinas Casado, S Isorna Martínez de la Riva, Jesús Puerta, C. Jiménez García, L Resel Estévez

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the urodynamic characteristics of uncoordinated voiding. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with a diagnosis of uncoordinated voiding were studied; 82% were females and 18% were males; mean age 11.9 years (range 5 to 34 yrs). All patients had a complete urodynamic study including patient history, neurological evaluation, uroflowmetry, cystometry and detrusor pressure/voiding flow. The perineal electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded throughout the study using surface electrodes. To rule out neurogenic detrusor-sphincter dyssynergy, periurethral sphincter EMG using concentric nail-electrodes was performed in selected cases (20% of the patients). Based on our urodynamic findings, three subtypes of uncoordinated voiding can be distinguished: Type A: micturition is achieved through detrusor involuntary contraction. Type B: micturition is achieved through detrusor voluntary contraction. Type C: micturition is achieved through abdominal straining. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: The most important urodynamic findings in uncoordinated voiding, independently of Q max, were the absence of relaxation and increased perineal EMG activity during uroflowmetry. The detrusor pressure/voiding flow test was essential in the classification of uncoordinated voiding. In our series, 58% of the patients were type A, 28% type B and 14% type C.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: To determine the urodynamic characteristics of uncoordinated voiding. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with a diagnosis of uncoordinated voiding were studied; 82% were females and 18% were males; mean age 11.9 years (range 5 to 34 yrs). All patients had a complete urodynamic study including patient history, neurological evaluation, uroflowmetry, cystometry and detrusor pressure/voiding flow. The perineal electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded throughout the study using surface electrodes. To rule out neurogenic detrusor-sphincter dyssynergy, periurethral sphincter EMG using concentric nail-electrodes was performed in selected cases (20% of the patients). Based on our urodynamic findings, three subtypes of uncoordinated voiding can be distinguished: Type A: micturition is achieved through detrusor involuntary contraction. Type B: micturition is achieved through detrusor voluntary contraction. Type C: micturition is achieved through abdominal straining. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: The most important urodynamic findings in uncoordinated voiding, independently of Q max, were the absence of relaxation and increased perineal EMG activity during uroflowmetry. The detrusor pressure/voiding flow test was essential in the classification of uncoordinated voiding. In our series, 58% of the patients were type A, 28% type B and 14% type C.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the urodynamic characteristics of uncoordinated voiding. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with a diagnosis of uncoordinated voiding were studied; 82% were females and 18% were males; mean age 11.9 years (range 5 to 34 yrs). All patients had a complete urodynamic study including patient history, neurological evaluation, uroflowmetry, cystometry and detrusor pressure/voiding flow. The perineal electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded throughout the study using surface electrodes. To rule out neurogenic detrusor-sphincter dyssynergy, periurethral sphincter EMG using concentric nail-electrodes was performed in selected cases (20% of the patients). Based on our urodynamic findings, three subtypes of uncoordinated voiding can be distinguished: Type A: micturition is achieved through detrusor involuntary contraction. Type B: micturition is achieved through detrusor voluntary contraction. Type C: micturition is achieved through abdominal straining. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: The most important urodynamic findings in uncoordinated voiding, independently of Q max, were the absence of relaxation and increased perineal EMG activity during uroflowmetry. The detrusor pressure/voiding flow test was essential in the classification of uncoordinated voiding. In our series, 58% of the patients were type A, 28% type B and 14% type C.

Key concepts: Cystometry, Medicine, Urination, Urology, Detrusor muscle, Urethral sphincter, Urodynamic testing, Electromyography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Non-coordinated voiding syndrome: classification and urodynamic characterization]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens