2014PubMedRequires access

[Influence of blocking B7/CD28 and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signals on immune function of sensitized mice].

Qixiang Ye, Lu‐Hong Xu, Wei Xu, Jianpei Fang

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

This study was aimed to explore the effects of blocking B7/CD28 and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signals on immune function of sensitized mice', and provide the evidences of acquired immune tolerance for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The mice sensitized on 7 day before transplant were divided into 4 groups: (1)CTLA4Ig+ anti-CD154 isotype control IgG; (2)anti-CD154 +CTLA4Ig isotype control IgG; (3)CTLA4Ig and anti-CD154; (4)isotype control IgG of CTLA4Ig and anti-CD154. CTLA4Ig and anti-CD154 used in normal BALB/c mice as isotype control IgG. Each mouse in all groups received CTLA4Ig and anti-CD154 (or corresponding isotype control IgG) 500 µg respectively, and was injected via tail vein on 7 day before transplant. There were 5 mice in each group. The mice were sacrificed on day 0, then the number of CD19(+)CD69(+)B cells, CD44(high)/CD62L(high) and CD44(high)/CD62L(low)/- T cells were measured by flow cytometry. Changes of cytokines and sensitized antibody were tested by ELISA or flow cytometry. The results showed that the numbers of CD19(+)CD69(+)B cells were significantly increased in comparison with the normal group (P < 0.01) , whereas the numbers of cells were significantly decreased when blocking B7/CD28 or /and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signals (P < 0.01) . Blocking these 2 signals together displayed a synergistic effect (P < 0.01) . The central memory and effector T cells were defined as CD44(high)/CD62L(high) and CD44(high)/CD62L(low)/- respectively, those increased significantly after sensitized in comparison with those in normal group, whereas their numbers decreased when blocking B7/CD28 or/and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signals. Blocking these two signals together, displayed a synergistic effect (P < 0.01). Cytokines, IgG and IgM in all groups were not significantly different. Sensitizing antibody test showed that the fluorescence intensity of sensitized group significantly increased as compared with normal group, whereas fluorescence intensity of CTLA4Ig or/and anti-CD154 treated groups significantly decreased as compared with sensitized group (P < 0.01) . It is concluded that blocking the B7/CD28 or/and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signal can inhibit the cellular and humoral immune function, whereas blocking these two signals together displays a synergistic effect.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study was aimed to explore the effects of blocking B7/CD28 and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signals on immune function of sensitized mice', and provide the evidences of acquired immune tolerance for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The mice sensitized on 7 day before transplant were divided into 4 groups: (1)CTLA4Ig+ anti-CD154 isotype control IgG; (2)anti-CD154 +CTLA4Ig isotype control IgG; (3)CTLA4Ig and anti-CD154; (4)isotype control IgG of CTLA4Ig and anti-CD154. CTLA4Ig and anti-CD154 used in normal BALB/c mice as isotype control IgG. Each mouse in all groups received CTLA4Ig and anti-CD154 (or corresponding isotype control IgG) 500 µg respectively, and was injected via tail vein on 7 day before transplant. There were 5 mice in each group. The mice were sacrificed on day 0, then the number of CD19(+)CD69(+)B cells, CD44(high)/CD62L(high) and CD44(high)/CD62L(low)/- T cells were measured by flow cytometry. Changes of cytokines and sensitized antibody were tested by ELISA or flow cytometry. The results showed that the numbers of CD19(+)CD69(+)B cells were significantly increased in comparison with the normal group (P < 0.01) , whereas the numbers of cells were significantly decreased when blocking B7/CD28 or /and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signals (P < 0.01) . Blocking these 2 signals together displayed a synergistic effect (P < 0.01) . The central memory and effector T cells were defined as CD44(high)/CD62L(high) and CD44(high)/CD62L(low)/- respectively, those increased significantly after sensitized in comparison with those in normal group, whereas their numbers decreased when blocking B7/CD28 or/and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signals. Blocking these two signals together, displayed a synergistic effect (P < 0.01). Cytokines, IgG and IgM in all groups were not significantly different. Sensitizing antibody test showed that the fluorescence intensity of sensitized group significantly increased as compared with normal group, whereas fluorescence intensity of CTLA4Ig or/and anti-CD154 treated groups significantly decreased as compared with sensitized group (P < 0.01) . It is concluded that blocking the B7/CD28 or/and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signal can inhibit the cellular and humoral immune function, whereas blocking these two signals together displays a synergistic effect.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study was aimed to explore the effects of blocking B7/CD28 and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signals on immune function of sensitized mice', and provide the evidences of acquired immune tolerance for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The mice sensitized on 7 day before transplant were divided into 4 groups: (1)CTLA4Ig+ anti-CD154 isotype control IgG; (2)anti-CD154 +CTLA4Ig isotype control IgG; (3)CTLA4Ig and anti-CD154; (4)isotype control IgG of CTLA4Ig and anti-CD154. CTLA4Ig and anti-CD154 used in normal BALB/c mice as isotype control IgG. Each mouse in all groups received CTLA4Ig and anti-CD154 (or corresponding isotype control IgG) 500 µg respectively, and was injected via tail vein on 7 day before transplant. There were 5 mice in each group. The mice were sacrificed on day 0, then the number of CD19(+)CD69(+)B cells, CD44(high)/CD62L(high) and CD44(high)/CD62L(low)/- T cells were measured by flow cytometry. Changes of cytokines and sensitized antibody were tested by ELISA or flow cytometry. The results showed that the numbers of CD19(+)CD69(+)B cells were significantly increased in comparison with the normal group (P < 0.01) , whereas the numbers of cells were significantly decreased when blocking B7/CD28 or /and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signals (P < 0.01) . Blocking these 2 signals together displayed a synergistic effect (P < 0.01) . The central memory and effector T cells were defined as CD44(high)/CD62L(high) and CD44(high)/CD62L(low)/- respectively, those increased significantly after sensitized in comparison with those in normal group, whereas their numbers decreased when blocking B7/CD28 or/and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signals. Blocking these two signals together, displayed a synergistic effect (P < 0.01). Cytokines, IgG and IgM in all groups were not significantly different. Sensitizing antibody test showed that the fluorescence intensity of sensitized group significantly increased as compared with normal group, whereas fluorescence intensity of CTLA4Ig or/and anti-CD154 treated groups significantly decreased as compared with sensitized group (P < 0.01) . It is concluded that blocking the B7/CD28 or/and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signal can inhibit the cellular and humoral immune function, whereas blocking these two signals together displays a synergistic effect.

Key concepts: CD154, Isotype, CD40, Flow cytometry, Blocking antibody, CD19, Immune system, CD28

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Influence of blocking B7/CD28 and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signals on immune function of sensitized mice]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens