2000PubMedRequires access

[Medical discretion versus the duty to inform of physicians in prisons--from the view of the prison physicians].

W Riekenbrauck

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The basic principle of medical discretion within the prisons and penal organs is regulated under section 182 StVollzG. It is advisable for the physicians as well as for the members of penal organs to handle the principle of medical discretion in prison with a great care and hence to encourage a better understanding and cooperation between the physicians and the patients in custody. The physicians should have the responsibility to administer the adequate diagnostic, treatment and meet relevant decisions within the existing regulations. The primary medical examination within the first 24 hrs in custody should be regarded as the central issue of the health care for the prisoners. The results of the examination should as well be under the above mentioned medical discretion. The section 182 StVollzG should be explained in a simplified and understandable form prior the primary medical examination has been done.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The basic principle of medical discretion within the prisons and penal organs is regulated under section 182 StVollzG. It is advisable for the physicians as well as for the members of penal organs to handle the principle of medical discretion in prison with a great care and hence to encourage a better understanding and cooperation between the physicians and the patients in custody. The physicians should have the responsibility to administer the adequate diagnostic, treatment and meet relevant decisions within the existing regulations. The primary medical examination within the first 24 hrs in custody should be regarded as the central issue of the health care for the prisoners. The results of the examination should as well be under the above mentioned medical discretion. The section 182 StVollzG should be explained in a simplified and understandable form prior the primary medical examination has been done.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The basic principle of medical discretion within the prisons and penal organs is regulated under section 182 StVollzG. It is advisable for the physicians as well as for the members of penal organs to handle the principle of medical discretion in prison with a great care and hence to encourage a better understanding and cooperation between the physicians and the patients in custody. The physicians should have the responsibility to administer the adequate diagnostic, treatment and meet relevant decisions within the existing regulations. The primary medical examination within the first 24 hrs in custody should be regarded as the central issue of the health care for the prisoners. The results of the examination should as well be under the above mentioned medical discretion. The section 182 StVollzG should be explained in a simplified and understandable form prior the primary medical examination has been done.

Key concepts: Discretion, Prison, Duty of care, Duty, Primary care, Psychology, Medicine, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Medical discretion versus the duty to inform of physicians in prisons--from the view of the prison physicians]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens