1989PubMedRequires access

Controlled trial of cephradine versus cefuroxime in vascular surgery.

Ian W. Barlow, J R Ausobsky, D. S. Wilkinson, R C Kester

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Two hundred and three consecutive patients undergoing acute or elective vascular reconstructions (N = 162) or amputations (N = 41) were randomized to receive either a single dose of cephradine 2 g intravenously or cefuroxime 1.5 g intravenously at induction of anaesthesia. Infective morbidity in both groups was assessed post-operatively as was therapeutic antibiotic prescribing. No significant differences in septic complications were found between patients receiving cefuroxime or cephradine. In addition, tissue penetration of each antibiotic was assessed by assay of serum and tissue specimens. Serum levels of cefuroxime were significantly less than cephradine 10 min after injection (median concentrations 115 micrograms/ml versus 182 micrograms/ml, p less than 0.01 Wilcoxon), but there were no differences in tissue penetration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two hundred and three consecutive patients undergoing acute or elective vascular reconstructions (N = 162) or amputations (N = 41) were randomized to receive either a single dose of cephradine 2 g intravenously or cefuroxime 1.5 g intravenously at induction of anaesthesia. Infective morbidity in both groups was assessed post-operatively as was therapeutic antibiotic prescribing. No significant differences in septic complications were found between patients receiving cefuroxime or cephradine. In addition, tissue penetration of each antibiotic was assessed by assay of serum and tissue specimens. Serum levels of cefuroxime were significantly less than cephradine 10 min after injection (median concentrations 115 micrograms/ml versus 182 micrograms/ml, p less than 0.01 Wilcoxon), but there were no differences in tissue penetration.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two hundred and three consecutive patients undergoing acute or elective vascular reconstructions (N = 162) or amputations (N = 41) were randomized to receive either a single dose of cephradine 2 g intravenously or cefuroxime 1.5 g intravenously at induction of anaesthesia. Infective morbidity in both groups was assessed post-operatively as was therapeutic antibiotic prescribing. No significant differences in septic complications were found between patients receiving cefuroxime or cephradine. In addition, tissue penetration of each antibiotic was assessed by assay of serum and tissue specimens. Serum levels of cefuroxime were significantly less than cephradine 10 min after injection (median concentrations 115 micrograms/ml versus 182 micrograms/ml, p less than 0.01 Wilcoxon), but there were no differences in tissue penetration.

Key concepts: Cephradine, Cefuroxime, Medicine, Antibiotics, Anesthesia, Surgery, Antibacterial agent, Randomized controlled trial

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Controlled trial of cephradine versus cefuroxime in vascular surgery. — Research Paper | ScholarLens