Controlling your control flow graph
Arun Karthik Kanuparthi, Jeyavijayan Rajendran, Ramesh Karri
Abstract
Arun Karthik Kanuparthi, Jeyavijayan Rajendran, Ramesh Karri
Abstract
Code Reuse Attacks (CRAs) are software exploits in which an attacker directs program control flow through existing code without injecting malicious code to achieve his objective. In this paper, we propose Dynamic Sequence Checker (DSC), a framework to verify the validity of control flow between basic blocks in the program. Unique codes are assigned to every basic block in the program at compile time in such a way that the Hamming distance between two legally connected basic blocks is a known constant. At runtime, Hamming distance between the codes assigned to the source and destination basic blocks are calculated and compared against the known constant, to verify the control flow. Execution is aborted if the Hamming distance comparison does not match. We implemented DSC on a cycle-accurate x86 simulator. DSC has been able to detect all the CRA gadgets reported by the ROPGadget tool. The average performance overhead is 4.7% over a baseline processor.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Code Reuse Attacks (CRAs) are software exploits in which an attacker directs program control flow through existing code without injecting malicious code to achieve his objective. In this paper, we propose Dynamic Sequence Checker (DSC), a framework to verify the validity of control flow between basic blocks in the program. Unique codes are assigned to every basic block in the program at compile time in such a way that the Hamming distance between two legally connected basic blocks is a known constant. At runtime, Hamming distance between the codes assigned to the source and destination basic blocks are calculated and compared against the known constant, to verify the control flow. Execution is aborted if the Hamming distance comparison does not match. We implemented DSC on a cycle-accurate x86 simulator. DSC has been able to detect all the CRA gadgets reported by the ROPGadget tool. The average performance overhead is 4.7% over a baseline processor.
Key concepts: Computer science, Control flow, Code reuse, Control flow graph, Hamming code, Hamming distance, Code (set theory), Unreachable code