Varicocele: the value of reflux in the spermatic vein.
N R Netto Júnior, Lerner Js, Paolini Rm, G M de Góes
Abstract
N R Netto Júnior, Lerner Js, Paolini Rm, G M de Góes
Abstract
Three groups of patients were studied: varicocele with altered spermogram (24 patients), varicocele with normal spermogram (12 patients), and 12 normal individuals. All underwent selective spermatic venography by the Seldinger technique. No statistically significant differences were found as to the presence of spermatic vein reflux in three groups, nor between varicocele patients and controls. It was concluded that reflux per se cannot explain the alterations of spermatogenesis, nor does it have prognostic value in varicocele.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Three groups of patients were studied: varicocele with altered spermogram (24 patients), varicocele with normal spermogram (12 patients), and 12 normal individuals. All underwent selective spermatic venography by the Seldinger technique. No statistically significant differences were found as to the presence of spermatic vein reflux in three groups, nor between varicocele patients and controls. It was concluded that reflux per se cannot explain the alterations of spermatogenesis, nor does it have prognostic value in varicocele.
Key concepts: Varicocele, Spermatic Vein, Reflux, Venography, Medicine, Urology, Internal medicine, Biology