2006•Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology)Requires access

Risk management, public interest and value for money for PPP projects: literature review and case studies

H. Darvish, Patrick X.W. Zou, Martin Loosemore, G. M. Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Public Private Partnership (PPP) method has been increasingly used to procure large scale infrastructures and public assets such as freeways, tunnels, bridges, hospitals, libraries, schools and prisons. The underlying principle of a PPP project is to achieve value for money for all project stakeholders involved in the partnership, by engaging them in a risk sharing relationship. While there have been many successful PPP projects, the unsuccessful PPP ones abound and the study of them can teach us how to better manage the risks associated with PPP projects. To this end, two PPP projects -- the Sydney Cross City Tunnel and Sydney Airport Railway Link, are used as case studies to scrutinize reasons leading to their current dilemma and articulate the valuable lessons learnt. It is concluded that protecting the public interests and allowing the private partners to gain reasonable return on their investments, are essential in achieving value for money in PPP projects. This can only be viable through optimal risk allocation and balanced interests between the public and private sector partners.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Public Private Partnership (PPP) method has been increasingly used to procure large scale infrastructures and public assets such as freeways, tunnels, bridges, hospitals, libraries, schools and prisons. The underlying principle of a PPP project is to achieve value for money for all project stakeholders involved in the partnership, by engaging them in a risk sharing relationship. While there have been many successful PPP projects, the unsuccessful PPP ones abound and the study of them can teach us how to better manage the risks associated with PPP projects. To this end, two PPP projects -- the Sydney Cross City Tunnel and Sydney Airport Railway Link, are used as case studies to scrutinize reasons leading to their current dilemma and articulate the valuable lessons learnt. It is concluded that protecting the public interests and allowing the private partners to gain reasonable return on their investments, are essential in achieving value for money in PPP projects. This can only be viable through optimal risk allocation and balanced interests between the public and private sector partners.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Public Private Partnership (PPP) method has been increasingly used to procure large scale infrastructures and public assets such as freeways, tunnels, bridges, hospitals, libraries, schools and prisons. The underlying principle of a PPP project is to achieve value for money for all project stakeholders involved in the partnership, by engaging them in a risk sharing relationship. While there have been many successful PPP projects, the unsuccessful PPP ones abound and the study of them can teach us how to better manage the risks associated with PPP projects. To this end, two PPP projects -- the Sydney Cross City Tunnel and Sydney Airport Railway Link, are used as case studies to scrutinize reasons leading to their current dilemma and articulate the valuable lessons learnt. It is concluded that protecting the public interests and allowing the private partners to gain reasonable return on their investments, are essential in achieving value for money in PPP projects. This can only be viable through optimal risk allocation and balanced interests between the public and private sector partners.

Key concepts: Value for money, General partnership, Public–private partnership, Dilemma, Value (mathematics), Business, Private sector, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Risk management, public interest and value for money for PPP projects: literature review and case studies — Research Paper | ScholarLens