[Comparison of nasal histamine and allergen provocations in patients with allergic rhinitis].
Rauf Tahamiler, Gkioukxel Saritzali, Salih Çanakçıoğlu
Abstract
Rauf Tahamiler, Gkioukxel Saritzali, Salih Çanakçıoğlu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effects of histamine and allergen provocations in the nasal mucosa. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nasal provocations were performed with extracts of histamine, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dp) and mixed grass pollen (Mg) in patients with perennial and seasonal allergic rhinitis and in healthy subjects. Nasal airway resistance (NAR), the amount of secretions, and the number of sneezes were recorded and evaluated. RESULTS: Regarding NAR, histamine provocation resulted in a significant difference compared to Dp provocation, but the difference was not significant when compared to Mg provocation. Only associated antigen provocation caused a significant increase in secretion. No significantly different effect on sneezing was detected between allergens and histamine. Considering total scores, histamine did not cause an increase in nasal reactivity in healthy subjects. A significant but slight difference was found between allergens and histamine in terms of nasal hyperreactivity in patients with allergic rhinitis. CONCLUSION: As there is a weakly significant difference between allergens and histamine in terms of nasal hyperreactivity in patients with allergic rhinitis, histamine provocation can be used in conditions where allergen provocation is not available.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effects of histamine and allergen provocations in the nasal mucosa. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nasal provocations were performed with extracts of histamine, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dp) and mixed grass pollen (Mg) in patients with perennial and seasonal allergic rhinitis and in healthy subjects. Nasal airway resistance (NAR), the amount of secretions, and the number of sneezes were recorded and evaluated. RESULTS: Regarding NAR, histamine provocation resulted in a significant difference compared to Dp provocation, but the difference was not significant when compared to Mg provocation. Only associated antigen provocation caused a significant increase in secretion. No significantly different effect on sneezing was detected between allergens and histamine. Considering total scores, histamine did not cause an increase in nasal reactivity in healthy subjects. A significant but slight difference was found between allergens and histamine in terms of nasal hyperreactivity in patients with allergic rhinitis. CONCLUSION: As there is a weakly significant difference between allergens and histamine in terms of nasal hyperreactivity in patients with allergic rhinitis, histamine provocation can be used in conditions where allergen provocation is not available.
Key concepts: Provocation test, Histamine, Nasal provocation test, Allergen, Medicine, Allergy, Immunology, Significant difference