1996PubMedRequires access

Virologic surveillance of poliomyelitis in Delhi.

S Khare, Riti Bhatia, Shweta Kumari, Datta Kk

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Virologic surveillance of poliomyelitis to monitor the transmission of wild polio virus in the community. STUDY AREA: All major hospitals of Delhi and surrounding area. METHODS: Stool samples were collected from 1221 cases of acute flaccid paralysis during 1992-1994 and were subjected to virus isolation on RD and HEp2 cell line. Viruses isolated were analyzed further by microneutralization test using polio and nonpolio antisera. The polio isolates were further characterized as vaccine or wild type using ELISA and probe technology. RESULTS: Out of the 1221 cases tested, virus was isolated in 57.4%. Among the virus positive cases, polio was isolated in 57% and in 43% non polio entero viruses were detected. The most prevalent was polio virus type 1. Most of the strains were wild type. CONCLUSION: Wild polio virus was prevailing in the community under study between the years 1992-1994.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: Virologic surveillance of poliomyelitis to monitor the transmission of wild polio virus in the community. STUDY AREA: All major hospitals of Delhi and surrounding area. METHODS: Stool samples were collected from 1221 cases of acute flaccid paralysis during 1992-1994 and were subjected to virus isolation on RD and HEp2 cell line. Viruses isolated were analyzed further by microneutralization test using polio and nonpolio antisera. The polio isolates were further characterized as vaccine or wild type using ELISA and probe technology. RESULTS: Out of the 1221 cases tested, virus was isolated in 57.4%. Among the virus positive cases, polio was isolated in 57% and in 43% non polio entero viruses were detected. The most prevalent was polio virus type 1. Most of the strains were wild type. CONCLUSION: Wild polio virus was prevailing in the community under study between the years 1992-1994.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: Virologic surveillance of poliomyelitis to monitor the transmission of wild polio virus in the community. STUDY AREA: All major hospitals of Delhi and surrounding area. METHODS: Stool samples were collected from 1221 cases of acute flaccid paralysis during 1992-1994 and were subjected to virus isolation on RD and HEp2 cell line. Viruses isolated were analyzed further by microneutralization test using polio and nonpolio antisera. The polio isolates were further characterized as vaccine or wild type using ELISA and probe technology. RESULTS: Out of the 1221 cases tested, virus was isolated in 57.4%. Among the virus positive cases, polio was isolated in 57% and in 43% non polio entero viruses were detected. The most prevalent was polio virus type 1. Most of the strains were wild type. CONCLUSION: Wild polio virus was prevailing in the community under study between the years 1992-1994.

Key concepts: Poliomyelitis, Medicine, Virology, Virus, Transmission (telecommunications), Acute flaccid paralysis, Poliovirus, Enterovirus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Virologic surveillance of poliomyelitis in Delhi. — Research Paper | ScholarLens