1997PubMedRequires access

Interactory effect between marginal plaque and subgingival proximal restorations on periodontal pocket depth.

Leif Jansson, S Blomster, A. Forsgardh, E Bergman, E Berglund, L. Foss, Érica Lui Reinhardt, B. Sjöberg

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of plaque on periodontal pocket depth adjacent to proximal amalgam restorations after non-surgical periodontal treatment. From 120 randomly selected patients 200 proximal premolar- or molar sites with subgingival restorations (test sites) and 200 contralateral unrestored sites within the same patient (control sites) were included if plaque was present on test as well as on control sites. At baseline the periodontal mean pocket depth adjacent to subgingival restorations were found to be significantly deeper (0.25 mm) than for control sites. After treatment, 24% of the initially subgingivally located restorations were registered as supragingival restorations. The differences according to mean pocket depth between supragingival restorations and corresponding control sites after treatment were found to be statistically non-significant. At reexamination mean pocket depth adjacent to proximal restorations with plaque were significantly deeper than their contralateral unrestored sites (mean difference 0.34 mm), while a non-significant difference was calculated for subgingival restorations without plaque. Subgingival restorations with their apical borders still located subgingivally after periodontal treatment should be regarded as a risk factor in periodontitis progression. Consequently, placement of the restoration margin supragingivally is recommended, especially in periodontitis-prone patients with an insufficient plaque control.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of plaque on periodontal pocket depth adjacent to proximal amalgam restorations after non-surgical periodontal treatment. From 120 randomly selected patients 200 proximal premolar- or molar sites with subgingival restorations (test sites) and 200 contralateral unrestored sites within the same patient (control sites) were included if plaque was present on test as well as on control sites. At baseline the periodontal mean pocket depth adjacent to subgingival restorations were found to be significantly deeper (0.25 mm) than for control sites. After treatment, 24% of the initially subgingivally located restorations were registered as supragingival restorations. The differences according to mean pocket depth between supragingival restorations and corresponding control sites after treatment were found to be statistically non-significant. At reexamination mean pocket depth adjacent to proximal restorations with plaque were significantly deeper than their contralateral unrestored sites (mean difference 0.34 mm), while a non-significant difference was calculated for subgingival restorations without plaque. Subgingival restorations with their apical borders still located subgingivally after periodontal treatment should be regarded as a risk factor in periodontitis progression. Consequently, placement of the restoration margin supragingivally is recommended, especially in periodontitis-prone patients with an insufficient plaque control.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of plaque on periodontal pocket depth adjacent to proximal amalgam restorations after non-surgical periodontal treatment. From 120 randomly selected patients 200 proximal premolar- or molar sites with subgingival restorations (test sites) and 200 contralateral unrestored sites within the same patient (control sites) were included if plaque was present on test as well as on control sites. At baseline the periodontal mean pocket depth adjacent to subgingival restorations were found to be significantly deeper (0.25 mm) than for control sites. After treatment, 24% of the initially subgingivally located restorations were registered as supragingival restorations. The differences according to mean pocket depth between supragingival restorations and corresponding control sites after treatment were found to be statistically non-significant. At reexamination mean pocket depth adjacent to proximal restorations with plaque were significantly deeper than their contralateral unrestored sites (mean difference 0.34 mm), while a non-significant difference was calculated for subgingival restorations without plaque. Subgingival restorations with their apical borders still located subgingivally after periodontal treatment should be regarded as a risk factor in periodontitis progression. Consequently, placement of the restoration margin supragingivally is recommended, especially in periodontitis-prone patients with an insufficient plaque control.

Key concepts: Medicine, Dentistry, Premolar, Gingival margin, Gingival and periodontal pocket, Orthodontics, Molar, Periodontitis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interactory effect between marginal plaque and subgingival proximal restorations on periodontal pocket depth. — Research Paper | ScholarLens