1988PubMedRequires access

[In vitro antibacterial activity of a new macrolide: miokamycin. Comparison with erythromycin and josamycin].

Soussy Cj, Roland Leclercq, J Duval

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of miokamycin (M) were evaluated by agar dilution, comparatively with erythromycin (E) and josamycin (J) for 81 bacterial strains chosen as a function of susceptibility and resistance to Macrolides-Lincosamides-Streptogramins group (MLS). On Gram positive cocci, mode MIC of E, J, and M for strains sensitive to MLS were respectively (micrograms/ml): Staphylococci: 0.25; 1; 2-Streptococci and Pneumococci: 0.016; 0.03-0.12; 0.06-0.25-Enterococci: 0.5; 0.5-1; 1-2. Activity of the three antibiotics was similar against Staphylococci resistant to lincomycin and streptogramin A, those resistant to streptogramins A and B, on Staphylococci and Streptococci only resistant to lincosamides by inactivation. M, as J, was active on coagulase negative (Staphylococci resistant to E by inactivation and on MLBB inducible Staphylococci; on these strains, M is a resistance non-inducible macrolide. Activity of E, J and M was reduced on MLSB inducible Streptococci. The three antibiotics were inactive on Staphylococci Streptococci and Enterococci MLSB resistant constitutive. On Haemophilus, E (2-8 micrograms/ml) was more active than J (2-16) and M (8-32). Thus, M, as J, was shown to be among macrolide antibiotics of resistance non-inducing type on MLSB inducible resistant Staphylococci; its activity was slightly inferior to that of J, but very similar to that of spiramycin, other macrolide of this group.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of miokamycin (M) were evaluated by agar dilution, comparatively with erythromycin (E) and josamycin (J) for 81 bacterial strains chosen as a function of susceptibility and resistance to Macrolides-Lincosamides-Streptogramins group (MLS). On Gram positive cocci, mode MIC of E, J, and M for strains sensitive to MLS were respectively (micrograms/ml): Staphylococci: 0.25; 1; 2-Streptococci and Pneumococci: 0.016; 0.03-0.12; 0.06-0.25-Enterococci: 0.5; 0.5-1; 1-2. Activity of the three antibiotics was similar against Staphylococci resistant to lincomycin and streptogramin A, those resistant to streptogramins A and B, on Staphylococci and Streptococci only resistant to lincosamides by inactivation. M, as J, was active on coagulase negative (Staphylococci resistant to E by inactivation and on MLBB inducible Staphylococci; on these strains, M is a resistance non-inducible macrolide. Activity of E, J and M was reduced on MLSB inducible Streptococci. The three antibiotics were inactive on Staphylococci Streptococci and Enterococci MLSB resistant constitutive. On Haemophilus, E (2-8 micrograms/ml) was more active than J (2-16) and M (8-32). Thus, M, as J, was shown to be among macrolide antibiotics of resistance non-inducing type on MLSB inducible resistant Staphylococci; its activity was slightly inferior to that of J, but very similar to that of spiramycin, other macrolide of this group.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of miokamycin (M) were evaluated by agar dilution, comparatively with erythromycin (E) and josamycin (J) for 81 bacterial strains chosen as a function of susceptibility and resistance to Macrolides-Lincosamides-Streptogramins group (MLS). On Gram positive cocci, mode MIC of E, J, and M for strains sensitive to MLS were respectively (micrograms/ml): Staphylococci: 0.25; 1; 2-Streptococci and Pneumococci: 0.016; 0.03-0.12; 0.06-0.25-Enterococci: 0.5; 0.5-1; 1-2. Activity of the three antibiotics was similar against Staphylococci resistant to lincomycin and streptogramin A, those resistant to streptogramins A and B, on Staphylococci and Streptococci only resistant to lincosamides by inactivation. M, as J, was active on coagulase negative (Staphylococci resistant to E by inactivation and on MLBB inducible Staphylococci; on these strains, M is a resistance non-inducible macrolide. Activity of E, J and M was reduced on MLSB inducible Streptococci. The three antibiotics were inactive on Staphylococci Streptococci and Enterococci MLSB resistant constitutive. On Haemophilus, E (2-8 micrograms/ml) was more active than J (2-16) and M (8-32). Thus, M, as J, was shown to be among macrolide antibiotics of resistance non-inducing type on MLSB inducible resistant Staphylococci; its activity was slightly inferior to that of J, but very similar to that of spiramycin, other macrolide of this group.

Key concepts: Josamycin, Lincosamides, Microbiology, Lincomycin, Spiramycin, Erythromycin, Antibiotics, Macrolide Antibiotics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[In vitro antibacterial activity of a new macrolide: miokamycin. Comparison with erythromycin and josamycin]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens