2013•Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British VolumeRequires access

Medial Patella-femoral ligament reconstruction for chronic patella instability-using a dynamic tendon transfer technique

Pat Smith, David M. J. Wood

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Purpose of the study To determine the outcome after the Semi-tendinosis tendon was used in reconstruction of the Medial Patella-femoral ligament using a fixed dynamic stabilising structure. Method The Adductor Magnus tendon insertion at the Adductor tubercle of the medial femoral condyle was used as a dynamic and fixed stabilising point preventing patella subluxation. This is a constant landmark in most patients and eliminates the need to find the isometric stabilisation point of the Medial Patella-femoral ligament. The Semi-tendinosus tendon was routed from its distal tibia attachment through a drill hole in the patella from distal to proximal. It was then transferred sub-vastus around the Adductor Magnus femoral attachment and sutured back onto itself at the inferior patella pole. It was tensioned at 30 degrees of knee flexion. Between 2004 and 2011 forty knees were reconstructed using the Semi-tendinosus tendon combined with an extra-synovial lateral release. All had failed conservative therapy for repeated patella instability. Post-operatively the patients followed a strict rehabilitation protocol. At follow-up the patients were questioned for any symptoms of patella instability or dislocation. Any complications of the surgery were documented. Patients were examined for any signs of patella apprehension or abnormal patella tracking. Results The male to female ratio was 2:3. The mean age was 26 (range13 to 33). The mean follow- up was 44 months. To date no recurrence of instability was noted. Within as early as 4 weeks post-surgery a reduction of patella apprehension was noted in all patients. 90% of patients were able to return to an active life-style. No serious complications were documented. Conclusion Transferring Semi-tendinosus around the fixed, dynamic distal insertion point of Adductor Magnus provides good results in the medium term and is a technique that may be combined with distal patella tendon realignment procedures. NO DISCLOSURES

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose of the study To determine the outcome after the Semi-tendinosis tendon was used in reconstruction of the Medial Patella-femoral ligament using a fixed dynamic stabilising structure. Method The Adductor Magnus tendon insertion at the Adductor tubercle of the medial femoral condyle was used as a dynamic and fixed stabilising point preventing patella subluxation. This is a constant landmark in most patients and eliminates the need to find the isometric stabilisation point of the Medial Patella-femoral ligament. The Semi-tendinosus tendon was routed from its distal tibia attachment through a drill hole in the patella from distal to proximal. It was then transferred sub-vastus around the Adductor Magnus femoral attachment and sutured back onto itself at the inferior patella pole. It was tensioned at 30 degrees of knee flexion. Between 2004 and 2011 forty knees were reconstructed using the Semi-tendinosus tendon combined with an extra-synovial lateral release. All had failed conservative therapy for repeated patella instability. Post-operatively the patients followed a strict rehabilitation protocol. At follow-up the patients were questioned for any symptoms of patella instability or dislocation. Any complications of the surgery were documented. Patients were examined for any signs of patella apprehension or abnormal patella tracking. Results The male to female ratio was 2:3. The mean age was 26 (range13 to 33). The mean follow- up was 44 months. To date no recurrence of instability was noted. Within as early as 4 weeks post-surgery a reduction of patella apprehension was noted in all patients. 90% of patients were able to return to an active life-style. No serious complications were documented. Conclusion Transferring Semi-tendinosus around the fixed, dynamic distal insertion point of Adductor Magnus provides good results in the medium term and is a technique that may be combined with distal patella tendon realignment procedures. NO DISCLOSURES

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose of the study To determine the outcome after the Semi-tendinosis tendon was used in reconstruction of the Medial Patella-femoral ligament using a fixed dynamic stabilising structure. Method The Adductor Magnus tendon insertion at the Adductor tubercle of the medial femoral condyle was used as a dynamic and fixed stabilising point preventing patella subluxation. This is a constant landmark in most patients and eliminates the need to find the isometric stabilisation point of the Medial Patella-femoral ligament. The Semi-tendinosus tendon was routed from its distal tibia attachment through a drill hole in the patella from distal to proximal. It was then transferred sub-vastus around the Adductor Magnus femoral attachment and sutured back onto itself at the inferior patella pole. It was tensioned at 30 degrees of knee flexion. Between 2004 and 2011 forty knees were reconstructed using the Semi-tendinosus tendon combined with an extra-synovial lateral release. All had failed conservative therapy for repeated patella instability. Post-operatively the patients followed a strict rehabilitation protocol. At follow-up the patients were questioned for any symptoms of patella instability or dislocation. Any complications of the surgery were documented. Patients were examined for any signs of patella apprehension or abnormal patella tracking. Results The male to female ratio was 2:3. The mean age was 26 (range13 to 33). The mean follow- up was 44 months. To date no recurrence of instability was noted. Within as early as 4 weeks post-surgery a reduction of patella apprehension was noted in all patients. 90% of patients were able to return to an active life-style. No serious complications were documented. Conclusion Transferring Semi-tendinosus around the fixed, dynamic distal insertion point of Adductor Magnus provides good results in the medium term and is a technique that may be combined with distal patella tendon realignment procedures. NO DISCLOSURES

Key concepts: Patella, Medicine, Medial collateral ligament, Medial patellofemoral ligament, Subluxation, Retinaculum, Ligament, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Medial Patella-femoral ligament reconstruction for chronic patella instability-using a dynamic tendon transfer technique — Research Paper | ScholarLens