2009PubMedRequires access

[Outcome of pars plana vitrectomy on idiopathic macular hole].

He F, Rongping Dai, Fangtian Dong

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for the treatment of idiopathic macular hole (IMH). METHODS: Retrospective observational case series. Retrospective analysis of vitrectomy for IMH patients treated between January 2001 and January 2008 was performed. The statistical software SPSS10.0 were used to analyze the data such as surgical technique, closure rate, BCVA, hole size and stage etc. The variables in normal distribution were compared by independent sample t-tests, the qualitative data were compared by R x C table, and the ordered data were compared by nonparametric tests. RESULTS: Fifty eight eyes of 57 patients underwent vitrectomy with gas (10% C(3)F(8)) injection. Primary closure was achieved in 44 eyes (75.9%) with an average hole size of 0.20 mm(2) (0.01 - 0.85 mm(2)), whereas the size in the remaining 14 eyes was 0.69 mm(2) (0.08 - 3.16 mm(2)). The closure rate of the 36 eyes treated with ILM peeling was 80.6% (29/36), and decreased visual acuity was not observed in 72.2% of them (26/36). The closure rate of the 22 eyes without ILM peeling was 68.2% (15/22), and decreased visual acuity was not observed in 59.1% of them (13/22). There was a significant difference in the size and the change of BCVA between the closed cases and the unclosed cases, and no other factors had significant effect on the BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: Vitrectomy was evaluated as an useful treatment for IMH. ILM peeling in vitrectomy could not improve the closure rate and the visual outcomes. Preoperative hole size may be a sensitive predictor for postoperative closure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for the treatment of idiopathic macular hole (IMH). METHODS: Retrospective observational case series. Retrospective analysis of vitrectomy for IMH patients treated between January 2001 and January 2008 was performed. The statistical software SPSS10.0 were used to analyze the data such as surgical technique, closure rate, BCVA, hole size and stage etc. The variables in normal distribution were compared by independent sample t-tests, the qualitative data were compared by R x C table, and the ordered data were compared by nonparametric tests. RESULTS: Fifty eight eyes of 57 patients underwent vitrectomy with gas (10% C(3)F(8)) injection. Primary closure was achieved in 44 eyes (75.9%) with an average hole size of 0.20 mm(2) (0.01 - 0.85 mm(2)), whereas the size in the remaining 14 eyes was 0.69 mm(2) (0.08 - 3.16 mm(2)). The closure rate of the 36 eyes treated with ILM peeling was 80.6% (29/36), and decreased visual acuity was not observed in 72.2% of them (26/36). The closure rate of the 22 eyes without ILM peeling was 68.2% (15/22), and decreased visual acuity was not observed in 59.1% of them (13/22). There was a significant difference in the size and the change of BCVA between the closed cases and the unclosed cases, and no other factors had significant effect on the BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: Vitrectomy was evaluated as an useful treatment for IMH. ILM peeling in vitrectomy could not improve the closure rate and the visual outcomes. Preoperative hole size may be a sensitive predictor for postoperative closure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for the treatment of idiopathic macular hole (IMH). METHODS: Retrospective observational case series. Retrospective analysis of vitrectomy for IMH patients treated between January 2001 and January 2008 was performed. The statistical software SPSS10.0 were used to analyze the data such as surgical technique, closure rate, BCVA, hole size and stage etc. The variables in normal distribution were compared by independent sample t-tests, the qualitative data were compared by R x C table, and the ordered data were compared by nonparametric tests. RESULTS: Fifty eight eyes of 57 patients underwent vitrectomy with gas (10% C(3)F(8)) injection. Primary closure was achieved in 44 eyes (75.9%) with an average hole size of 0.20 mm(2) (0.01 - 0.85 mm(2)), whereas the size in the remaining 14 eyes was 0.69 mm(2) (0.08 - 3.16 mm(2)). The closure rate of the 36 eyes treated with ILM peeling was 80.6% (29/36), and decreased visual acuity was not observed in 72.2% of them (26/36). The closure rate of the 22 eyes without ILM peeling was 68.2% (15/22), and decreased visual acuity was not observed in 59.1% of them (13/22). There was a significant difference in the size and the change of BCVA between the closed cases and the unclosed cases, and no other factors had significant effect on the BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: Vitrectomy was evaluated as an useful treatment for IMH. ILM peeling in vitrectomy could not improve the closure rate and the visual outcomes. Preoperative hole size may be a sensitive predictor for postoperative closure.

Key concepts: Vitrectomy, Pars plana, Macular hole, Medicine, Visual acuity, Ophthalmology, Retrospective cohort study, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Outcome of pars plana vitrectomy on idiopathic macular hole]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens