1994PubMedRequires access

Intravenous diltiazem versus isosorbide dinitrate for unstable angina: comparison of coronary angiographic morphology in the unstable and stabilized states.

Tetsuya Uchida, Nozomu Kaneko, S Tanino, Hiroshi Ogawa, T Iwasaki, Yoshifumi Horikawa, Tetsuya Sumiyoshi, S Hosoda

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of intravenous infusion of diltiazem was compared with that of isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) for the early treatment of unstable angina. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with at least 70% organic stenosis of the culprit artery and prolonged rest angina were enrolled. Coronary angiography was performed on admission. Subsequently, patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous diltiazem or ISDN. Coronary angiography was repeated when the angina was under control, and the findings were compared with those on admission. RESULTS: Diltiazem was more effective than ISDN, and symptoms were resolved in 84% of the diltiazem group compared with 47% of the ISDN group (P = 0.0038). Repeat coronary angiography showed that the degree of stenosis remained unchanged in the majority of patients (n = 47, 75.8%). There was no difference between the two groups with regard to the coronary angiographic findings. CONCLUSIONS: Since diltiazem was more effective than ISDN even though the coronary angiographic findings of the two groups were similar, it is possible that some action other than vasodilatation (such as a direct protective effect on the myocardium) may be responsible for the remission of unstable angina.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of intravenous infusion of diltiazem was compared with that of isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) for the early treatment of unstable angina. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with at least 70% organic stenosis of the culprit artery and prolonged rest angina were enrolled. Coronary angiography was performed on admission. Subsequently, patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous diltiazem or ISDN. Coronary angiography was repeated when the angina was under control, and the findings were compared with those on admission. RESULTS: Diltiazem was more effective than ISDN, and symptoms were resolved in 84% of the diltiazem group compared with 47% of the ISDN group (P = 0.0038). Repeat coronary angiography showed that the degree of stenosis remained unchanged in the majority of patients (n = 47, 75.8%). There was no difference between the two groups with regard to the coronary angiographic findings. CONCLUSIONS: Since diltiazem was more effective than ISDN even though the coronary angiographic findings of the two groups were similar, it is possible that some action other than vasodilatation (such as a direct protective effect on the myocardium) may be responsible for the remission of unstable angina.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of intravenous infusion of diltiazem was compared with that of isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) for the early treatment of unstable angina. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with at least 70% organic stenosis of the culprit artery and prolonged rest angina were enrolled. Coronary angiography was performed on admission. Subsequently, patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous diltiazem or ISDN. Coronary angiography was repeated when the angina was under control, and the findings were compared with those on admission. RESULTS: Diltiazem was more effective than ISDN, and symptoms were resolved in 84% of the diltiazem group compared with 47% of the ISDN group (P = 0.0038). Repeat coronary angiography showed that the degree of stenosis remained unchanged in the majority of patients (n = 47, 75.8%). There was no difference between the two groups with regard to the coronary angiographic findings. CONCLUSIONS: Since diltiazem was more effective than ISDN even though the coronary angiographic findings of the two groups were similar, it is possible that some action other than vasodilatation (such as a direct protective effect on the myocardium) may be responsible for the remission of unstable angina.

Key concepts: Isosorbide dinitrate, Diltiazem, Medicine, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Unstable angina, Angina, Stenosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intravenous diltiazem versus isosorbide dinitrate for unstable angina: comparison of coronary angiographic morphology in the unstable and stabilized states. — Research Paper | ScholarLens