[Evaluation of preoperative prism adaptation in patients with acquired esotropia].
Hiroshi Ohtsuki, Satoshi Hasebe, Yasunori Tadokoro, Fumiko Kishimoto, Sung Eun Song Watanabe, Masaki Okano
Abstract
Hiroshi Ohtsuki, Satoshi Hasebe, Yasunori Tadokoro, Fumiko Kishimoto, Sung Eun Song Watanabe, Masaki Okano
Abstract
A prospective study was carried out of the evaluation preoperative prism adaptation in 77 patients with acquired esotropia. Sixty-three patients who showed a stable esodeviation with prisms of 10 prism diopter or less by alternate prism cover test and fusion response to the prisms were classified as prism responders and were randomly classified into two groups. Thirty-one patients of prism responders underwent surgery based on the prism adapted angle. Patients in the other 32 cases were assigned to undergo surgery for their initially measured angle. On the other hand, 14 patients who did not respond to prism adaptation underwent surgery for their preoperative measured angle of deviation. Success rates with deviations of 0 to 10 prism diopters measured 1 year after surgery by the alternative prism cover test at 5 m and with fusion on Bagolini's striated glasses test were highest (26 [84%] of 31 patients) in prism adaptation responders who underwent surgery for prism determined angle and lowest (3 [21%] of 14 patients) in the prism adaptation nonresponder who showed no fusion response to the prisms.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A prospective study was carried out of the evaluation preoperative prism adaptation in 77 patients with acquired esotropia. Sixty-three patients who showed a stable esodeviation with prisms of 10 prism diopter or less by alternate prism cover test and fusion response to the prisms were classified as prism responders and were randomly classified into two groups. Thirty-one patients of prism responders underwent surgery based on the prism adapted angle. Patients in the other 32 cases were assigned to undergo surgery for their initially measured angle. On the other hand, 14 patients who did not respond to prism adaptation underwent surgery for their preoperative measured angle of deviation. Success rates with deviations of 0 to 10 prism diopters measured 1 year after surgery by the alternative prism cover test at 5 m and with fusion on Bagolini's striated glasses test were highest (26 [84%] of 31 patients) in prism adaptation responders who underwent surgery for prism determined angle and lowest (3 [21%] of 14 patients) in the prism adaptation nonresponder who showed no fusion response to the prisms.
Key concepts: Prism adaptation, Prism, Dioptre, Minimum deviation, Esotropia, Medicine, Ophthalmology, Surgery