1985PubMedRequires access

Which cephalosporin for wound prophylaxis? An experimental comparison of three drugs.

Scher Ks, Jones Cw

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

An experimental wound model was used to evaluate the effectiveness of cefazolin, cefamandole, and cefotaxime in the prevention of wound infection. Incisions were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, or a standardized fecal suspension. Regardless of the contaminant employed, the prophylactic use of either cefazolin, cefamandole, or cefotaxime yielded lower concentrations of bacteria in the wounds and fewer infections compared with treatment with saline solution. Within the context of this experimental model, cefazolin proved equally as effective as the newer and more expensive cephalosporins, cefamandole and cefotaxime.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An experimental wound model was used to evaluate the effectiveness of cefazolin, cefamandole, and cefotaxime in the prevention of wound infection. Incisions were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, or a standardized fecal suspension. Regardless of the contaminant employed, the prophylactic use of either cefazolin, cefamandole, or cefotaxime yielded lower concentrations of bacteria in the wounds and fewer infections compared with treatment with saline solution. Within the context of this experimental model, cefazolin proved equally as effective as the newer and more expensive cephalosporins, cefamandole and cefotaxime.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An experimental wound model was used to evaluate the effectiveness of cefazolin, cefamandole, and cefotaxime in the prevention of wound infection. Incisions were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, or a standardized fecal suspension. Regardless of the contaminant employed, the prophylactic use of either cefazolin, cefamandole, or cefotaxime yielded lower concentrations of bacteria in the wounds and fewer infections compared with treatment with saline solution. Within the context of this experimental model, cefazolin proved equally as effective as the newer and more expensive cephalosporins, cefamandole and cefotaxime.

Key concepts: Cefamandole, Cefazolin, Cefotaxime, Medicine, Cephalosporin, Staphylococcus aureus, Microbiology, Context (archaeology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Which cephalosporin for wound prophylaxis? An experimental comparison of three drugs. — Research Paper | ScholarLens