Which cephalosporin for wound prophylaxis? An experimental comparison of three drugs.
Scher Ks, Jones Cw
Abstract
Scher Ks, Jones Cw
Abstract
An experimental wound model was used to evaluate the effectiveness of cefazolin, cefamandole, and cefotaxime in the prevention of wound infection. Incisions were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, or a standardized fecal suspension. Regardless of the contaminant employed, the prophylactic use of either cefazolin, cefamandole, or cefotaxime yielded lower concentrations of bacteria in the wounds and fewer infections compared with treatment with saline solution. Within the context of this experimental model, cefazolin proved equally as effective as the newer and more expensive cephalosporins, cefamandole and cefotaxime.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
An experimental wound model was used to evaluate the effectiveness of cefazolin, cefamandole, and cefotaxime in the prevention of wound infection. Incisions were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, or a standardized fecal suspension. Regardless of the contaminant employed, the prophylactic use of either cefazolin, cefamandole, or cefotaxime yielded lower concentrations of bacteria in the wounds and fewer infections compared with treatment with saline solution. Within the context of this experimental model, cefazolin proved equally as effective as the newer and more expensive cephalosporins, cefamandole and cefotaxime.
Key concepts: Cefamandole, Cefazolin, Cefotaxime, Medicine, Cephalosporin, Staphylococcus aureus, Microbiology, Context (archaeology)