2008•PubMedRequires access

[Intraspecific taxonomic differentiation in ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) in the view of the morphological conception of species].

Filippova Na

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The criterions for two most used intraspecific taxonomic ranks of ticks--subspecies and morphotype, have been formulated on the basis of the study of morphological variation in the distribution range of all active ontogenetic stages of 11 polymorphic species. All these species are vectors of transmissible diseases. They have vast distribution ranges and different types of host-parasite relationships. Subspecies have the complexes of visual morphological differences expressed in one or both sexes of mature ticks more limited, than those of related species. At immature stages differences of subspecies consist more often in morphometric characters and can be established by the methods of mathematical statistics only. Morphotypes, as a rule, differ at each corresponding stage by "their own" complexes of morphometric characters. All differential parameters of studied morphotypes are overlapped, but have statistically significant differences (by the Student's test). The concrete variations of differentiation by subspecies and morphotypes have been considered. The historical factors of intraspecific differentiation have been reconstructed for each species.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The criterions for two most used intraspecific taxonomic ranks of ticks--subspecies and morphotype, have been formulated on the basis of the study of morphological variation in the distribution range of all active ontogenetic stages of 11 polymorphic species. All these species are vectors of transmissible diseases. They have vast distribution ranges and different types of host-parasite relationships. Subspecies have the complexes of visual morphological differences expressed in one or both sexes of mature ticks more limited, than those of related species. At immature stages differences of subspecies consist more often in morphometric characters and can be established by the methods of mathematical statistics only. Morphotypes, as a rule, differ at each corresponding stage by "their own" complexes of morphometric characters. All differential parameters of studied morphotypes are overlapped, but have statistically significant differences (by the Student's test). The concrete variations of differentiation by subspecies and morphotypes have been considered. The historical factors of intraspecific differentiation have been reconstructed for each species.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The criterions for two most used intraspecific taxonomic ranks of ticks--subspecies and morphotype, have been formulated on the basis of the study of morphological variation in the distribution range of all active ontogenetic stages of 11 polymorphic species. All these species are vectors of transmissible diseases. They have vast distribution ranges and different types of host-parasite relationships. Subspecies have the complexes of visual morphological differences expressed in one or both sexes of mature ticks more limited, than those of related species. At immature stages differences of subspecies consist more often in morphometric characters and can be established by the methods of mathematical statistics only. Morphotypes, as a rule, differ at each corresponding stage by "their own" complexes of morphometric characters. All differential parameters of studied morphotypes are overlapped, but have statistically significant differences (by the Student's test). The concrete variations of differentiation by subspecies and morphotypes have been considered. The historical factors of intraspecific differentiation have been reconstructed for each species.

Key concepts: Subspecies, Intraspecific competition, Biology, Ixodidae, Acari, Zoology, Taxonomy (biology), Range (aeronautics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Intraspecific taxonomic differentiation in ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) in the view of the morphological conception of species]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens