1977ACS symposium seriesRequires access

A Comparison of Coal Beneficiation Methods

S. Min, T.D. Wheelock

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Although iron pyrites and other minerals are removed from coal on an industrial scale almost exclusively by gravity separation methods at the present time, other beneficiation methods are coming into use. Among the developing methods, froth flotation ( 1,2,3 ) is the foremost, although the oil agglomeration method ( 4,5,6 ) is also promising. Both of these methods take advantage of the difference in surface properties of coal and inorganic mineral particles suspended in water to effect a separation. In the first method the hydrophobic coal particles are removed from the hydrophilic mineral particles by selective attachment to a mass of air bubbles, while in the second method the coal particles are selectively coated and agglomerated by fuel oil and then recovered by screening. While gravity separation methods are well suited for removing coarse mineral particles from coal, they are generally ineffective for removing microscopic particles. On the other hand, both the froth flotation

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although iron pyrites and other minerals are removed from coal on an industrial scale almost exclusively by gravity separation methods at the present time, other beneficiation methods are coming into use. Among the developing methods, froth flotation ( 1,2,3 ) is the foremost, although the oil agglomeration method ( 4,5,6 ) is also promising. Both of these methods take advantage of the difference in surface properties of coal and inorganic mineral particles suspended in water to effect a separation. In the first method the hydrophobic coal particles are removed from the hydrophilic mineral particles by selective attachment to a mass of air bubbles, while in the second method the coal particles are selectively coated and agglomerated by fuel oil and then recovered by screening. While gravity separation methods are well suited for removing coarse mineral particles from coal, they are generally ineffective for removing microscopic particles. On the other hand, both the froth flotation

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although iron pyrites and other minerals are removed from coal on an industrial scale almost exclusively by gravity separation methods at the present time, other beneficiation methods are coming into use. Among the developing methods, froth flotation ( 1,2,3 ) is the foremost, although the oil agglomeration method ( 4,5,6 ) is also promising. Both of these methods take advantage of the difference in surface properties of coal and inorganic mineral particles suspended in water to effect a separation. In the first method the hydrophobic coal particles are removed from the hydrophilic mineral particles by selective attachment to a mass of air bubbles, while in the second method the coal particles are selectively coated and agglomerated by fuel oil and then recovered by screening. While gravity separation methods are well suited for removing coarse mineral particles from coal, they are generally ineffective for removing microscopic particles. On the other hand, both the froth flotation

Key concepts: Beneficiation, Gravity separation, Coal, Economies of agglomeration, Froth flotation, Mineral, Mineral oil, Iron ore

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison of Coal Beneficiation Methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens