2005The Japanese Journal of UrologyOpen access

RETROPERITONEOSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL CELL CARCINOMA

Hiroshi Iwamura, Hiromitsu Negoro, Seiji Moroi, Hiroya Oka, Mutsushi Kawakita

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: We report our initial experiences of retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2002 to October 2003, we performed 11 retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Our indication was T1N0M0 renal tumors which sizes were about 4 cm or less and were exophytic and were not situated at the renal hilum. First we inserted single J catheter to the renal pelvis cystoscopically. under fluoroscopic guidance. Next 4 trocars were set at pneumoretroperitoneum and the renal artery and vein were clamped individually after cold saline was circulated from the single J catheter. Renal parenchyma was sharply cut with scissors and vessels were coagulated with bipolar coagulator. When renal collecting system was opened, cariceal suture repair was performed. We used the microwave tissue coagulator without clamping the renal pedicle when the tumor was 2 cm or less in diameter and the distance from the tumor edge to the renal collecting system was more than 1cm. RESULTS: In 9 cases renal pedicles were clamped and in 2 cases were not. Mean tumor size was 27.5 +/- 8.9 mm and mean operative time was 350 +/- 92 minutes and mean estimated blood loss was 743 +/- 998 ml, and mean warm ischemic time was 70 +/- 30 minutes. In one case bleeding from cut surface was uncontrollable, so open conversion was needed. In this case the renal artery and vein were clamed but another artery exited. The surgical margins were all negative, and no other complications were happened. Post operative serum creatinine raised soon after the operation but finally downed, and the mean up level was 0.07 ng/ml only. But RI examination revealed the residual renal damages were in proportioned to the warm ischemic times. During a mean followup of 8 months no patients has had local recurrence or metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma is effective for select patients. But better cooling method and earlier suture technique and more long follow-up periods will be necessary for establishment.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: We report our initial experiences of retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2002 to October 2003, we performed 11 retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Our indication was T1N0M0 renal tumors which sizes were about 4 cm or less and were exophytic and were not situated at the renal hilum. First we inserted single J catheter to the renal pelvis cystoscopically. under fluoroscopic guidance. Next 4 trocars were set at pneumoretroperitoneum and the renal artery and vein were clamped individually after cold saline was circulated from the single J catheter. Renal parenchyma was sharply cut with scissors and vessels were coagulated with bipolar coagulator. When renal collecting system was opened, cariceal suture repair was performed. We used the microwave tissue coagulator without clamping the renal pedicle when the tumor was 2 cm or less in diameter and the distance from the tumor edge to the renal collecting system was more than 1cm. RESULTS: In 9 cases renal pedicles were clamped and in 2 cases were not. Mean tumor size was 27.5 +/- 8.9 mm and mean operative time was 350 +/- 92 minutes and mean estimated blood loss was 743 +/- 998 ml, and mean warm ischemic time was 70 +/- 30 minutes. In one case bleeding from cut surface was uncontrollable, so open conversion was needed. In this case the renal artery and vein were clamed but another artery exited. The surgical margins were all negative, and no other complications were happened. Post operative serum creatinine raised soon after the operation but finally downed, and the mean up level was 0.07 ng/ml only. But RI examination revealed the residual renal damages were in proportioned to the warm ischemic times. During a mean followup of 8 months no patients has had local recurrence or metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma is effective for select patients. But better cooling method and earlier suture technique and more long follow-up periods will be necessary for establishment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: We report our initial experiences of retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2002 to October 2003, we performed 11 retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Our indication was T1N0M0 renal tumors which sizes were about 4 cm or less and were exophytic and were not situated at the renal hilum. First we inserted single J catheter to the renal pelvis cystoscopically. under fluoroscopic guidance. Next 4 trocars were set at pneumoretroperitoneum and the renal artery and vein were clamped individually after cold saline was circulated from the single J catheter. Renal parenchyma was sharply cut with scissors and vessels were coagulated with bipolar coagulator. When renal collecting system was opened, cariceal suture repair was performed. We used the microwave tissue coagulator without clamping the renal pedicle when the tumor was 2 cm or less in diameter and the distance from the tumor edge to the renal collecting system was more than 1cm. RESULTS: In 9 cases renal pedicles were clamped and in 2 cases were not. Mean tumor size was 27.5 +/- 8.9 mm and mean operative time was 350 +/- 92 minutes and mean estimated blood loss was 743 +/- 998 ml, and mean warm ischemic time was 70 +/- 30 minutes. In one case bleeding from cut surface was uncontrollable, so open conversion was needed. In this case the renal artery and vein were clamed but another artery exited. The surgical margins were all negative, and no other complications were happened. Post operative serum creatinine raised soon after the operation but finally downed, and the mean up level was 0.07 ng/ml only. But RI examination revealed the residual renal damages were in proportioned to the warm ischemic times. During a mean followup of 8 months no patients has had local recurrence or metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma is effective for select patients. But better cooling method and earlier suture technique and more long follow-up periods will be necessary for establishment.

Key concepts: Nephrectomy, Renal cell carcinoma, Medicine, Urology, Internal medicine, Kidney

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
RETROPERITONEOSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL CELL CARCINOMA — Research Paper | ScholarLens