[Intact canal wall mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty in treating patients with cholesteatoma of the middle ear and mastoid].
Ying He, Yong Liang, Xiaolong Liu, Gang Li, Ying Hu
Abstract
Ying He, Yong Liang, Xiaolong Liu, Gang Li, Ying Hu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of intact canal wall mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty in treating patients with cholesteatoma of the middle ear and mastoid. METHOD: Fifty-seven patients underwent intact canal wall mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty. RESULT: In all cases who had been followed up for 1-8 years, 5 ears were infected, 2 patients needed second operation, and 3 ears suffered from cholesteatoma recurrence. Tympanic membrane of 29 ears kept integrity although with pocket retraction to some extent. Extrusion of the prosthesis occurred in 2 cases. The postoperative audiometric measurement (the average hearing threshold at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 kHz HL) was improved by more than 10 dB HL in 39 ears (72.2%), the mean air bone gap (ABG) of 29 ears was reduced to less than 20 dB HL. CONCLUSION: Intact canal wall technique could remain anatomical structure and improve hearing effectually in treating the patients with cholesteatoma in the middle ear and mastoid.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of intact canal wall mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty in treating patients with cholesteatoma of the middle ear and mastoid. METHOD: Fifty-seven patients underwent intact canal wall mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty. RESULT: In all cases who had been followed up for 1-8 years, 5 ears were infected, 2 patients needed second operation, and 3 ears suffered from cholesteatoma recurrence. Tympanic membrane of 29 ears kept integrity although with pocket retraction to some extent. Extrusion of the prosthesis occurred in 2 cases. The postoperative audiometric measurement (the average hearing threshold at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 kHz HL) was improved by more than 10 dB HL in 39 ears (72.2%), the mean air bone gap (ABG) of 29 ears was reduced to less than 20 dB HL. CONCLUSION: Intact canal wall technique could remain anatomical structure and improve hearing effectually in treating the patients with cholesteatoma in the middle ear and mastoid.
Key concepts: Tympanoplasty, Cholesteatoma, Medicine, Mastoidectomy, Middle ear, Surgery, Ear canal, Radiology