The Brugada syndrome: can we predict the risk?
Serdar Bayata
Abstract
Serdar Bayata
Abstract
Since its introduction in 1992, the Brugada syndrome has attracted great interest because of increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Risk stratification aimed at the identification of patients at risk for sudden death is an important goal of current research. Controversy exists on risk stratification particularly in asymptomatic individuals. The predictive value of the inducibility of ventricular tachyarrhythmias is also discussed controversially. Currently, an implantable cardioverter defibrillator is the only proven effective treatment for the disease.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Since its introduction in 1992, the Brugada syndrome has attracted great interest because of increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Risk stratification aimed at the identification of patients at risk for sudden death is an important goal of current research. Controversy exists on risk stratification particularly in asymptomatic individuals. The predictive value of the inducibility of ventricular tachyarrhythmias is also discussed controversially. Currently, an implantable cardioverter defibrillator is the only proven effective treatment for the disease.
Key concepts: Brugada syndrome, Medicine, Risk stratification, Asymptomatic, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Sudden cardiac death, Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator