2005North Carolina Medical JournalRequires access

The Tyranny of the Diagnosis Code1

Vergil N. Slee, Debora A. Slee, H. Joachim Schmidt

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

The electronic medical record (EMR), while having acknowledged advantages over the paper record and powerful constituencies advocating its adoption, is not in widespread use. One significant obstacle to its acceptance by physicians has not been addressed--its failure to provide easy input for the patients exact diagnoses and for the retrieval of those diagnoses during subsequent patient care. Furthermore, our system designers have failed to respond to the expansion of the use of the medical record from its origin as simply the physician's memory and communication tool to becoming the building block for our Medical Record Health Information System (MRHIS), where it also supplies the justification for payment for care and is the source of fundamental statistics about health and healthcare. These problems reflect a basic flaw in the application of available information technology to EMR design and data management: We use output codes--the category codes from ICD-9-CM--for input of diagnoses. This fact imposes the tyranny. Our medical record must have these ICD-9-CM codes for the reimbursement system. But, to be accepted as the basic record for medical care, and at the same time, to be truly useful for case retrieval and statistics, medical informatics experts recognize that our EMR must have codes for the exact diagnoses of the patient (diagnosis entities). But no practical method for their input and management has been offered This paper proposes a way to provide easy input of diagnosis entities, and their permanent coding as a workable solution to the problem.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The electronic medical record (EMR), while having acknowledged advantages over the paper record and powerful constituencies advocating its adoption, is not in widespread use. One significant obstacle to its acceptance by physicians has not been addressed--its failure to provide easy input for the patients exact diagnoses and for the retrieval of those diagnoses during subsequent patient care. Furthermore, our system designers have failed to respond to the expansion of the use of the medical record from its origin as simply the physician's memory and communication tool to becoming the building block for our Medical Record Health Information System (MRHIS), where it also supplies the justification for payment for care and is the source of fundamental statistics about health and healthcare. These problems reflect a basic flaw in the application of available information technology to EMR design and data management: We use output codes--the category codes from ICD-9-CM--for input of diagnoses. This fact imposes the tyranny. Our medical record must have these ICD-9-CM codes for the reimbursement system. But, to be accepted as the basic record for medical care, and at the same time, to be truly useful for case retrieval and statistics, medical informatics experts recognize that our EMR must have codes for the exact diagnoses of the patient (diagnosis entities). But no practical method for their input and management has been offered This paper proposes a way to provide easy input of diagnosis entities, and their permanent coding as a workable solution to the problem.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The electronic medical record (EMR), while having acknowledged advantages over the paper record and powerful constituencies advocating its adoption, is not in widespread use. One significant obstacle to its acceptance by physicians has not been addressed--its failure to provide easy input for the patients exact diagnoses and for the retrieval of those diagnoses during subsequent patient care. Furthermore, our system designers have failed to respond to the expansion of the use of the medical record from its origin as simply the physician's memory and communication tool to becoming the building block for our Medical Record Health Information System (MRHIS), where it also supplies the justification for payment for care and is the source of fundamental statistics about health and healthcare. These problems reflect a basic flaw in the application of available information technology to EMR design and data management: We use output codes--the category codes from ICD-9-CM--for input of diagnoses. This fact imposes the tyranny. Our medical record must have these ICD-9-CM codes for the reimbursement system. But, to be accepted as the basic record for medical care, and at the same time, to be truly useful for case retrieval and statistics, medical informatics experts recognize that our EMR must have codes for the exact diagnoses of the patient (diagnosis entities). But no practical method for their input and management has been offered This paper proposes a way to provide easy input of diagnosis entities, and their permanent coding as a workable solution to the problem.

Key concepts: Medical diagnosis, Medical classification, Reimbursement, Diagnosis code, Medical record, Health informatics, Coding (social sciences), Health care

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Tyranny of the Diagnosis Code1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens