[Improved the accuracy of 99mTc-MAG3 plasma clearance method: the problem of the calculated plasma volume and its modification].
Nobuaki Watanabe, K Takahashi, A Komatani, Konosuke Yamaguchi
Abstract
Nobuaki Watanabe, K Takahashi, A Komatani, Konosuke Yamaguchi
Abstract
The 99mTc-MAG3 plasma clearance method (MPC method), reported by Oriuchi et al., is a simple and useful count-based gamma camera method for calculating the 99mTc-MAG3 plasma clearance (CLMAG). However, a discrepancy of CLMAG calculated by MPC method (MPC-CLMAG) from the tubular extraction rate (TER) calculated by Russell's single-sample clearance determination (Russell-TER) was noted. The calculated plasma volume is assumed to be the cause. Since the plasma volume is reported to have a linear correlation with body surface area, Dissmann's formula was applied to calculate the plasma volume. Then Dissmann's formula was replaced by Ogawa's formula in the MPC method, and the procedure was then called the modified MPC method. The CLMAG were obtained using MPC method, modified MPC method and the TER was obtained Russell's method in 95 patients with urological disorders. Then the MPC-CLMAG and modified MPC-CLMAG were compared with Russell-TER. Comparison of the MPC-CLMAG with the Russell-TER demonstrated a coefficient of correlation of 0.82, but dissociation of the slope of regression lines was found between males and females. The modified MPC-CLMAG improved the coefficient of correlation to 0.92, and diminished the dissociation of the slope of regression lines between males and females. We verified that the dissociation was due to the plasma volume calculated by Ogawa's formula. Ogawa's formula included hematocrit, body weight, body height and different coefficients for gender. The plasma volume calculated by Ogawa's formula were lower in males and higher in females than that calculated by Dissmann's formula. And marked discrepancy in the plasma volume in patients with a body surface area below 0.5 m2 was observed. So the MPC method might become more accurate by substituting Dissmann's formula for Ogawa's formula resolting in a method that is applicable to both males and females, children and adults in clinical use.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The 99mTc-MAG3 plasma clearance method (MPC method), reported by Oriuchi et al., is a simple and useful count-based gamma camera method for calculating the 99mTc-MAG3 plasma clearance (CLMAG). However, a discrepancy of CLMAG calculated by MPC method (MPC-CLMAG) from the tubular extraction rate (TER) calculated by Russell's single-sample clearance determination (Russell-TER) was noted. The calculated plasma volume is assumed to be the cause. Since the plasma volume is reported to have a linear correlation with body surface area, Dissmann's formula was applied to calculate the plasma volume. Then Dissmann's formula was replaced by Ogawa's formula in the MPC method, and the procedure was then called the modified MPC method. The CLMAG were obtained using MPC method, modified MPC method and the TER was obtained Russell's method in 95 patients with urological disorders. Then the MPC-CLMAG and modified MPC-CLMAG were compared with Russell-TER. Comparison of the MPC-CLMAG with the Russell-TER demonstrated a coefficient of correlation of 0.82, but dissociation of the slope of regression lines was found between males and females. The modified MPC-CLMAG improved the coefficient of correlation to 0.92, and diminished the dissociation of the slope of regression lines between males and females. We verified that the dissociation was due to the plasma volume calculated by Ogawa's formula. Ogawa's formula included hematocrit, body weight, body height and different coefficients for gender. The plasma volume calculated by Ogawa's formula were lower in males and higher in females than that calculated by Dissmann's formula. And marked discrepancy in the plasma volume in patients with a body surface area below 0.5 m2 was observed. So the MPC method might become more accurate by substituting Dissmann's formula for Ogawa's formula resolting in a method that is applicable to both males and females, children and adults in clinical use.
Key concepts: Plasma clearance, Plasma volume, Chemistry, Volume (thermodynamics), Correlation coefficient, Linear correlation, Hematocrit, Plasma