1989PubMedRequires access

[Adhesion capacity and surface properties of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus].

Carbonero Mj, Álvaro Pascual, Luis Martı́nez-Martı́nez, Perea Ej

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

We have comparatively studied the adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis and S. saprophyticus to epithelial cells of a continuous cellular line of urinary origin (MDCK). The adherence of S. saprophyticus was significantly higher than that of S. epidermidis and this phenomenon was not related to the bacterial surface hydrophobicity or the ability of producing slime in vitro. The pre-incubation of the bacteria with sub-inhibitory concentrations of vancomycin, teicoplanin, amikacin, clindamycin, and roxitromycin did not modify the adherence ability of the microorganisms. Of the antimicrobial agents evaluated, only clindamycin significantly agents evaluated, only clindamycin, significantly inhibited the ability of producing slime of S. saprophyticus strains.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We have comparatively studied the adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis and S. saprophyticus to epithelial cells of a continuous cellular line of urinary origin (MDCK). The adherence of S. saprophyticus was significantly higher than that of S. epidermidis and this phenomenon was not related to the bacterial surface hydrophobicity or the ability of producing slime in vitro. The pre-incubation of the bacteria with sub-inhibitory concentrations of vancomycin, teicoplanin, amikacin, clindamycin, and roxitromycin did not modify the adherence ability of the microorganisms. Of the antimicrobial agents evaluated, only clindamycin significantly agents evaluated, only clindamycin, significantly inhibited the ability of producing slime of S. saprophyticus strains.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We have comparatively studied the adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis and S. saprophyticus to epithelial cells of a continuous cellular line of urinary origin (MDCK). The adherence of S. saprophyticus was significantly higher than that of S. epidermidis and this phenomenon was not related to the bacterial surface hydrophobicity or the ability of producing slime in vitro. The pre-incubation of the bacteria with sub-inhibitory concentrations of vancomycin, teicoplanin, amikacin, clindamycin, and roxitromycin did not modify the adherence ability of the microorganisms. Of the antimicrobial agents evaluated, only clindamycin significantly agents evaluated, only clindamycin, significantly inhibited the ability of producing slime of S. saprophyticus strains.

Key concepts: Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Microbiology, Clindamycin, Antimicrobial, Teicoplanin, Antibiotics, Bacteria

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Adhesion capacity and surface properties of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens