1998PubMedRequires access

[Pulmonary embolism. Current aspects of treatment].

P. Girard

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

INDICATIONS FOR DRUG THROMBOLYSIS: There has been much debate on the indications for drug thrombolysis in pulmonary embolism. Thrombolysis would not appear to be justified excepting in massive pulmonary embolism when clinical signs or explorations evidence poor hemodynamic tolerance. Current data would confirm its independent effect on reducing mortality in such cases. MECHANICAL THROMBOLYSIS: The clinical efficacy of mechanical thrombolysis has not been demonstrated. It should not be used outside rigorously controlled clinical trials in patients with severe pulmonary embolism and with a formal contraindication for drug thrombolysis or in case of failure. THE PREPIC STUDY: The first controlled prospective trial on caval filters confirmed that indications for caval interruption in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis should be limited to contraindications and failures of anticoagulant therapy. Other indications for filters, whether temporary or definitive, should be evaluated with specific controlled prospective trials. LOW-MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARINS: If this possibility is confirmed for the treatment of pulmonary embolism, it will provide a simple rational treatment for venous thromboembolism. 'SMALL CLOTS': Changing diagnostic strategies, particularly the use of helical CT angiography, has raised the question of therapeutic abstention when "small" clots are undetectable by this exploration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INDICATIONS FOR DRUG THROMBOLYSIS: There has been much debate on the indications for drug thrombolysis in pulmonary embolism. Thrombolysis would not appear to be justified excepting in massive pulmonary embolism when clinical signs or explorations evidence poor hemodynamic tolerance. Current data would confirm its independent effect on reducing mortality in such cases. MECHANICAL THROMBOLYSIS: The clinical efficacy of mechanical thrombolysis has not been demonstrated. It should not be used outside rigorously controlled clinical trials in patients with severe pulmonary embolism and with a formal contraindication for drug thrombolysis or in case of failure. THE PREPIC STUDY: The first controlled prospective trial on caval filters confirmed that indications for caval interruption in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis should be limited to contraindications and failures of anticoagulant therapy. Other indications for filters, whether temporary or definitive, should be evaluated with specific controlled prospective trials. LOW-MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARINS: If this possibility is confirmed for the treatment of pulmonary embolism, it will provide a simple rational treatment for venous thromboembolism. 'SMALL CLOTS': Changing diagnostic strategies, particularly the use of helical CT angiography, has raised the question of therapeutic abstention when "small" clots are undetectable by this exploration.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INDICATIONS FOR DRUG THROMBOLYSIS: There has been much debate on the indications for drug thrombolysis in pulmonary embolism. Thrombolysis would not appear to be justified excepting in massive pulmonary embolism when clinical signs or explorations evidence poor hemodynamic tolerance. Current data would confirm its independent effect on reducing mortality in such cases. MECHANICAL THROMBOLYSIS: The clinical efficacy of mechanical thrombolysis has not been demonstrated. It should not be used outside rigorously controlled clinical trials in patients with severe pulmonary embolism and with a formal contraindication for drug thrombolysis or in case of failure. THE PREPIC STUDY: The first controlled prospective trial on caval filters confirmed that indications for caval interruption in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis should be limited to contraindications and failures of anticoagulant therapy. Other indications for filters, whether temporary or definitive, should be evaluated with specific controlled prospective trials. LOW-MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARINS: If this possibility is confirmed for the treatment of pulmonary embolism, it will provide a simple rational treatment for venous thromboembolism. 'SMALL CLOTS': Changing diagnostic strategies, particularly the use of helical CT angiography, has raised the question of therapeutic abstention when "small" clots are undetectable by this exploration.

Key concepts: Medicine, Thrombolysis, Contraindication, Pulmonary embolism, Deep vein, Thrombosis, Clinical trial, Intensive care medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Pulmonary embolism. Current aspects of treatment]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens