1994•PubMedRequires access

Gastrointestinal tolerance of [2,2-dimethyl-6-(4-chlorophenyl-7-phenyl- 2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrolizine-5-yl]-acetic acid in the rat.

Stefan Laufer, S. Tries, J Augustin, Reiner Elsässer, Algate Dr, Atterson Pr, Munt Pl

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

The gastrointestinal tolerance of [2,2-dimethyl-6-(4-chlorophenyl)-7- phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrolizine-5-yl]-acetic acid (ML 3000, CAS 156897-06-2) has been tested in comparison with indometacin, after both single and multiple administrations for 5 and 11 days in an in vivo rat assay. A single oral administration of ML 3000 at doses of 10, 30 and 100 mg/kg produced no gastrointestinal damage. Repeated oral administration of ML 3000 at daily doses of 10, 30 and 100 mg/kg produced slight gastrointestinal damage, but the effect was minimal and was not found to be statistically significant. Indometacin produced highly statistically significant gastric and duodenal damage following one single administration of 10 mg/kg. Repeated oral administration, at 3 mg/kg each day, produced moderate and statistically significant gastric and slight duodenal damage on Day 5 of dosing. However, by Day 11 pronounced duodenal damage was observed which was shown to be statistically highly significant. These results indicate that ML 3000 is clearly better tolerated by the gastrointestinal tract than indometacin after single and multiple administration up to 11 days in rats.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The gastrointestinal tolerance of [2,2-dimethyl-6-(4-chlorophenyl)-7- phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrolizine-5-yl]-acetic acid (ML 3000, CAS 156897-06-2) has been tested in comparison with indometacin, after both single and multiple administrations for 5 and 11 days in an in vivo rat assay. A single oral administration of ML 3000 at doses of 10, 30 and 100 mg/kg produced no gastrointestinal damage. Repeated oral administration of ML 3000 at daily doses of 10, 30 and 100 mg/kg produced slight gastrointestinal damage, but the effect was minimal and was not found to be statistically significant. Indometacin produced highly statistically significant gastric and duodenal damage following one single administration of 10 mg/kg. Repeated oral administration, at 3 mg/kg each day, produced moderate and statistically significant gastric and slight duodenal damage on Day 5 of dosing. However, by Day 11 pronounced duodenal damage was observed which was shown to be statistically highly significant. These results indicate that ML 3000 is clearly better tolerated by the gastrointestinal tract than indometacin after single and multiple administration up to 11 days in rats.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The gastrointestinal tolerance of [2,2-dimethyl-6-(4-chlorophenyl)-7- phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrolizine-5-yl]-acetic acid (ML 3000, CAS 156897-06-2) has been tested in comparison with indometacin, after both single and multiple administrations for 5 and 11 days in an in vivo rat assay. A single oral administration of ML 3000 at doses of 10, 30 and 100 mg/kg produced no gastrointestinal damage. Repeated oral administration of ML 3000 at daily doses of 10, 30 and 100 mg/kg produced slight gastrointestinal damage, but the effect was minimal and was not found to be statistically significant. Indometacin produced highly statistically significant gastric and duodenal damage following one single administration of 10 mg/kg. Repeated oral administration, at 3 mg/kg each day, produced moderate and statistically significant gastric and slight duodenal damage on Day 5 of dosing. However, by Day 11 pronounced duodenal damage was observed which was shown to be statistically highly significant. These results indicate that ML 3000 is clearly better tolerated by the gastrointestinal tract than indometacin after single and multiple administration up to 11 days in rats.

Key concepts: Indometacin, Oral administration, Gastrointestinal tract, Medicine, In vivo, Pharmacology, Acetic acid, Stomach

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Gastrointestinal tolerance of [2,2-dimethyl-6-(4-chlorophenyl-7-phenyl- 2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrolizine-5-yl]-acetic acid in the rat. — Research Paper | ScholarLens