1983PubMedRequires access

[In vitro comparison of the antibacterial activity of 1st, 2d, and 3d generation cephalosporins].

Messmer Jc, E Lecaillon-Thibon, Bon F, H Soler

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of first, second and third generation cephalosporins on bacterial strains. 1 920 strains are analyzed. Results establish that Cefalotin remains valuable against Gram positive pathogens, especially staphylococci. Lamoxactam is the most potent cephalosporin against Gram-negative bacteria.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of first, second and third generation cephalosporins on bacterial strains. 1 920 strains are analyzed. Results establish that Cefalotin remains valuable against Gram positive pathogens, especially staphylococci. Lamoxactam is the most potent cephalosporin against Gram-negative bacteria.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of first, second and third generation cephalosporins on bacterial strains. 1 920 strains are analyzed. Results establish that Cefalotin remains valuable against Gram positive pathogens, especially staphylococci. Lamoxactam is the most potent cephalosporin against Gram-negative bacteria.

Key concepts: Cephalosporin, Cefalotin, Microbiology, In vitro, Gram-negative bacteria, Antibacterial activity, Bacteria, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[In vitro comparison of the antibacterial activity of 1st, 2d, and 3d generation cephalosporins]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens