1996•PubMedRequires access

[Otoacoustic emission and auditory efferent function testing in normal subjects and patients with sensori-neural hearing loss].

Fang Liang, C Liu, B Liu

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of otoacoustic emission and function test of the auditory efferent system in evaluating of auditory functional status in both normal and diseased conditions. METHODS: Spontaneous and transient evoked otoacoustic emission and efferent function in terms of contralateral white noise induced transient evoked otoacoustic emission suppressions were tested and cross compared in 32 normal ears, 24 ears with cochlear hearing loss and 16 ears with retrocochlear hearing loss. RESULTS: Transient evoked otoacoustic emission amplitude and contralateral suppression, spontaneous otoacoustic emission incidence, peaks and frequency range were significantly reduced in cochlear hearing loss, while in retrocochlear hearing loss transient evoked otoacoustic emission and spontaneous otoacoustic emission levels were significantly higher than in cochlear hearing loss group and showed no suppression. CONCLUSION: Contralateral acoustic stimulation induced transient evoked otoacoustic emission suppression as an index of efferent function is clinically feasible. Combined otoacoustic emission and efferent tests are of great significance in evaluating cochlea status and auditory central mechanisms. Auditory efferent function is weakened in cochlear lesions and severely damaged in retrocochlear lesions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of otoacoustic emission and function test of the auditory efferent system in evaluating of auditory functional status in both normal and diseased conditions. METHODS: Spontaneous and transient evoked otoacoustic emission and efferent function in terms of contralateral white noise induced transient evoked otoacoustic emission suppressions were tested and cross compared in 32 normal ears, 24 ears with cochlear hearing loss and 16 ears with retrocochlear hearing loss. RESULTS: Transient evoked otoacoustic emission amplitude and contralateral suppression, spontaneous otoacoustic emission incidence, peaks and frequency range were significantly reduced in cochlear hearing loss, while in retrocochlear hearing loss transient evoked otoacoustic emission and spontaneous otoacoustic emission levels were significantly higher than in cochlear hearing loss group and showed no suppression. CONCLUSION: Contralateral acoustic stimulation induced transient evoked otoacoustic emission suppression as an index of efferent function is clinically feasible. Combined otoacoustic emission and efferent tests are of great significance in evaluating cochlea status and auditory central mechanisms. Auditory efferent function is weakened in cochlear lesions and severely damaged in retrocochlear lesions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of otoacoustic emission and function test of the auditory efferent system in evaluating of auditory functional status in both normal and diseased conditions. METHODS: Spontaneous and transient evoked otoacoustic emission and efferent function in terms of contralateral white noise induced transient evoked otoacoustic emission suppressions were tested and cross compared in 32 normal ears, 24 ears with cochlear hearing loss and 16 ears with retrocochlear hearing loss. RESULTS: Transient evoked otoacoustic emission amplitude and contralateral suppression, spontaneous otoacoustic emission incidence, peaks and frequency range were significantly reduced in cochlear hearing loss, while in retrocochlear hearing loss transient evoked otoacoustic emission and spontaneous otoacoustic emission levels were significantly higher than in cochlear hearing loss group and showed no suppression. CONCLUSION: Contralateral acoustic stimulation induced transient evoked otoacoustic emission suppression as an index of efferent function is clinically feasible. Combined otoacoustic emission and efferent tests are of great significance in evaluating cochlea status and auditory central mechanisms. Auditory efferent function is weakened in cochlear lesions and severely damaged in retrocochlear lesions.

Key concepts: Otoacoustic emission, Efferent, Audiology, Cochlea, Medicine, Hearing loss, Tinnitus, Anatomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Otoacoustic emission and auditory efferent function testing in normal subjects and patients with sensori-neural hearing loss]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens