2011PubMedRequires access

[Surgical strategy for mitral regurgitation in ischemic cardiomyopathy].

Shinichi Mizutani, Akihiko Usui, Hideki Oshima, Yuji Narita, Yoshimori Araki, Yuichi Ueda

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Surgical strategy for the mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) still remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the operative outcome and long-term survival in patients with ICM, MR. METHODS: Perioperative data and surgical results of 35 patients with ischemic MR were collected. Mitral annuloplasty with artificial ring (MAP) was performed in 27 patients and mitral valve replacement (MVR) in 8 patients. Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in MVR was significantly lower (23.1 +/- 11.8 : 33.4 +/- 10.3%, p < 0.05) and the left ventricular diastolic dimension (LVDd) was dilated (73.7 +/- 9.3: 64.2 +/- 7.0 mm, p < 0.01). Concomitant procedures including coronary artery bypass grafting and/or left ventricular reconstruction were performed in more than half patients. RESULTS: No operative death was observed in both groups. Postoperative data showed that MVR still remained in low left ventricular (LV) function. Six of 27 patients in MAP developed more than grade 2 MR during follow up period and 1 required reoperation. No significant difference was observed in survival and in freedom rate from cardiac event between groups. CONCLUSIONS: MAP had no impact on operative outcome and long-term survival in patients with ICM, MR. MVR should be considered in patients with severely impaired LV function to avoid the risk of recurrence of MR.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: Surgical strategy for the mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) still remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the operative outcome and long-term survival in patients with ICM, MR. METHODS: Perioperative data and surgical results of 35 patients with ischemic MR were collected. Mitral annuloplasty with artificial ring (MAP) was performed in 27 patients and mitral valve replacement (MVR) in 8 patients. Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in MVR was significantly lower (23.1 +/- 11.8 : 33.4 +/- 10.3%, p < 0.05) and the left ventricular diastolic dimension (LVDd) was dilated (73.7 +/- 9.3: 64.2 +/- 7.0 mm, p < 0.01). Concomitant procedures including coronary artery bypass grafting and/or left ventricular reconstruction were performed in more than half patients. RESULTS: No operative death was observed in both groups. Postoperative data showed that MVR still remained in low left ventricular (LV) function. Six of 27 patients in MAP developed more than grade 2 MR during follow up period and 1 required reoperation. No significant difference was observed in survival and in freedom rate from cardiac event between groups. CONCLUSIONS: MAP had no impact on operative outcome and long-term survival in patients with ICM, MR. MVR should be considered in patients with severely impaired LV function to avoid the risk of recurrence of MR.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: Surgical strategy for the mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) still remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the operative outcome and long-term survival in patients with ICM, MR. METHODS: Perioperative data and surgical results of 35 patients with ischemic MR were collected. Mitral annuloplasty with artificial ring (MAP) was performed in 27 patients and mitral valve replacement (MVR) in 8 patients. Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in MVR was significantly lower (23.1 +/- 11.8 : 33.4 +/- 10.3%, p < 0.05) and the left ventricular diastolic dimension (LVDd) was dilated (73.7 +/- 9.3: 64.2 +/- 7.0 mm, p < 0.01). Concomitant procedures including coronary artery bypass grafting and/or left ventricular reconstruction were performed in more than half patients. RESULTS: No operative death was observed in both groups. Postoperative data showed that MVR still remained in low left ventricular (LV) function. Six of 27 patients in MAP developed more than grade 2 MR during follow up period and 1 required reoperation. No significant difference was observed in survival and in freedom rate from cardiac event between groups. CONCLUSIONS: MAP had no impact on operative outcome and long-term survival in patients with ICM, MR. MVR should be considered in patients with severely impaired LV function to avoid the risk of recurrence of MR.

Key concepts: Medicine, Cardiology, Ejection fraction, Internal medicine, Ischemic cardiomyopathy, Mitral valve repair, Perioperative, Mitral regurgitation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Surgical strategy for mitral regurgitation in ischemic cardiomyopathy]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens