2002DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Open access

Architecting/Designing Engineering Systems Using Real Options

Richard de Neufville

Open full text 38 citations

Abstract

Everyone concerned with engineering systems faces a common issue: How do we design systems to perform well in a constantly evolving and thus risky context? As professionals concerned with the system (rather than its individual pieces), this design issues predominantly relates to the overall configuration, the architecture of the system. This paper presents an approach to this fundamental issue. It suggests how we could architect flexible engineering systems that can evolve optimally to meet new challenges and opportunities. It suggests that the methods of “options analysis”-- that have revolutionized thinking about investments -- can provide a conceptual basis for defining optimal configurations. When these procedures are applied to design issues, they are generally known as "real options analysis". The fundamental result of "real options analysis" is the determination of the value of flexibility. It thus permits system designers and managers to decide which flexible design elements, that permit their system to evolve effectively over time, are worth their cost. It thus provides a clear rationale for when to design specific types of flexibility into the system.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Everyone concerned with engineering systems faces a common issue: How do we design systems to perform well in a constantly evolving and thus risky context? As professionals concerned with the system (rather than its individual pieces), this design issues predominantly relates to the overall configuration, the architecture of the system. This paper presents an approach to this fundamental issue. It suggests how we could architect flexible engineering systems that can evolve optimally to meet new challenges and opportunities. It suggests that the methods of “options analysis”-- that have revolutionized thinking about investments -- can provide a conceptual basis for defining optimal configurations. When these procedures are applied to design issues, they are generally known as "real options analysis". The fundamental result of "real options analysis" is the determination of the value of flexibility. It thus permits system designers and managers to decide which flexible design elements, that permit their system to evolve effectively over time, are worth their cost. It thus provides a clear rationale for when to design specific types of flexibility into the system.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Everyone concerned with engineering systems faces a common issue: How do we design systems to perform well in a constantly evolving and thus risky context? As professionals concerned with the system (rather than its individual pieces), this design issues predominantly relates to the overall configuration, the architecture of the system. This paper presents an approach to this fundamental issue. It suggests how we could architect flexible engineering systems that can evolve optimally to meet new challenges and opportunities. It suggests that the methods of “options analysis”-- that have revolutionized thinking about investments -- can provide a conceptual basis for defining optimal configurations. When these procedures are applied to design issues, they are generally known as "real options analysis". The fundamental result of "real options analysis" is the determination of the value of flexibility. It thus permits system designers and managers to decide which flexible design elements, that permit their system to evolve effectively over time, are worth their cost. It thus provides a clear rationale for when to design specific types of flexibility into the system.

Key concepts: Flexibility (engineering), Risk analysis (engineering), Systems engineering, Context (archaeology), Computer science, Systems design, Architecture, System of systems

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Architecting/Designing Engineering Systems Using Real Options — Research Paper | ScholarLens