2005PubMedRequires access

[Indicators as the basis for quality-control in the midwifery practice].

Louwrens Boomsma, Pien M. Offerhaus, Darie O. A. Daemers, S Flikweert

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A study on the quality of primary obstetric care in uncomplicated pregnancies carried out by means of a checklist revealed substandard factors in perinatal care in 71 out of 72 pregnancies. However there are many objections to the quality-control procedure. Some items on the original checklist had to be abandoned due to lack of evidence. In other items definitions and circumstances had not been properly considered and in some cases the patient's own wishes were responsible for a change in policy. The quality of the care delivered cannot be judged only by counting items on a checklist, but requires careful consideration of the situation and of the circumstances that led to the choices in perinatal care.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A study on the quality of primary obstetric care in uncomplicated pregnancies carried out by means of a checklist revealed substandard factors in perinatal care in 71 out of 72 pregnancies. However there are many objections to the quality-control procedure. Some items on the original checklist had to be abandoned due to lack of evidence. In other items definitions and circumstances had not been properly considered and in some cases the patient's own wishes were responsible for a change in policy. The quality of the care delivered cannot be judged only by counting items on a checklist, but requires careful consideration of the situation and of the circumstances that led to the choices in perinatal care.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A study on the quality of primary obstetric care in uncomplicated pregnancies carried out by means of a checklist revealed substandard factors in perinatal care in 71 out of 72 pregnancies. However there are many objections to the quality-control procedure. Some items on the original checklist had to be abandoned due to lack of evidence. In other items definitions and circumstances had not been properly considered and in some cases the patient's own wishes were responsible for a change in policy. The quality of the care delivered cannot be judged only by counting items on a checklist, but requires careful consideration of the situation and of the circumstances that led to the choices in perinatal care.

Key concepts: Checklist, Medicine, Quality (philosophy), Control (management), Nursing, Obstetrics, Family medicine, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Indicators as the basis for quality-control in the midwifery practice]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens