1996PubMedRequires access

[Evaluation of the direct antiglobulin test].

Nina Juraković-Lončar, Željka Hundrić-Hašpl, Maja Lang Balija, Damir Grgičević

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The validity of a direct antiglobulin test (DAT) was evaluated by testing 7645 blood samples from hospitalized patients. DAT was routinely done in 7201 blood samples sent for pretransfusion testing and 444 blood samples specifically sent for the examination of immune hemolysis. Positive DAT was discovered in 0.04% (3/7201) pretransfusion samples and in 3.83% (17/444) samples examined for immune hemolysis. In 16 of the samples with positive DAT, IgG antibodies with or without complements and in 4 samples only components of complements were detected on RBC. The cost of positive DAT in pretransfusion testing is 92 times higher than that of DAT during laboratory investigation of immune hemolysis. Due to a low frequency of positive DAT during pretransfusion testing, its cast and the fact that patients had no clinical signs of immune hemolysis, we advocate no use of a routine DAT during pretransfusion testing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The validity of a direct antiglobulin test (DAT) was evaluated by testing 7645 blood samples from hospitalized patients. DAT was routinely done in 7201 blood samples sent for pretransfusion testing and 444 blood samples specifically sent for the examination of immune hemolysis. Positive DAT was discovered in 0.04% (3/7201) pretransfusion samples and in 3.83% (17/444) samples examined for immune hemolysis. In 16 of the samples with positive DAT, IgG antibodies with or without complements and in 4 samples only components of complements were detected on RBC. The cost of positive DAT in pretransfusion testing is 92 times higher than that of DAT during laboratory investigation of immune hemolysis. Due to a low frequency of positive DAT during pretransfusion testing, its cast and the fact that patients had no clinical signs of immune hemolysis, we advocate no use of a routine DAT during pretransfusion testing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The validity of a direct antiglobulin test (DAT) was evaluated by testing 7645 blood samples from hospitalized patients. DAT was routinely done in 7201 blood samples sent for pretransfusion testing and 444 blood samples specifically sent for the examination of immune hemolysis. Positive DAT was discovered in 0.04% (3/7201) pretransfusion samples and in 3.83% (17/444) samples examined for immune hemolysis. In 16 of the samples with positive DAT, IgG antibodies with or without complements and in 4 samples only components of complements were detected on RBC. The cost of positive DAT in pretransfusion testing is 92 times higher than that of DAT during laboratory investigation of immune hemolysis. Due to a low frequency of positive DAT during pretransfusion testing, its cast and the fact that patients had no clinical signs of immune hemolysis, we advocate no use of a routine DAT during pretransfusion testing.

Key concepts: Hemolysis, Coombs test, Medicine, Antibody, Immune system, Immunology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Evaluation of the direct antiglobulin test]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens