2002Unpublished venueRequires access

Effects of Prescribed Fire on Herpetofauna Within Hardwood Forests of the Upper Piedmont of South Carolina: A Preliminary Analysis

Thomas M. Floyd, Kevin R. Russell, Christopher E. Moorman, David H. Van Lear, David C. Guynn, J. Drew Lanham

Open publisher page 23 citations

Abstract

Despite a large body of knowledge concerning the use of prescribed burning for wildlife management, amphibians and reptiles (collectively, herpetofauna) have received relatively little attention regarding their responses to fire. With few exceptions, previous studies of herpetofauna and prescribed burning have been confined to fire-maintained, pine-dominated ecosystems in the Coastal Plain of the southeastern United States. We initiated a study to examine effects of prescribed burning on herpetofauna in Piedmont upland hardwood stands. Linear drift fence arrays with pitfall traps were installed within control and treatment plots to assess effects of burn treatments through analysis of species captures. Treatment plots were subjected to low intensity winter and growing season fire. The initial prescribed burn treatments were implemented in February and March (1999) while the second prescribed burn treatments were implemented in April (2000). All treatment plots were burned with strip head fires set 10-20 feet apart resulting in flame lengths averaging less than 1 foot. Direct searching and drift fence sampling immediately after each prescribed burn revealed 1) no evidence of direct herpetofaunal mortality, and 2) no evidence of emigration from burn plots. Statistical analysis of data through the installation of the second burn (May 1999 through April 2000) revealed no significant difference between burned and unburned treatments for abundance, richness (S), diversity (H’), or evenness (J’)(P > 0.1) of the herpetofaunal community. 1Graduate Research Assistant, Professor, Assistant Professor, School of Natural Resources, Department of Forest Resources, 261 Lehotsky Hall, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634-0331; Wildlife Research Biologist, Willamette Industries, Inc., Coast Operations, P.O. Box 488, Dallas, Oregon 97338-0488; Assistant Professor, Department of Forestry, North Carolina State University, Box 8003, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8003, respectively. Citation for proceedings: Outcalt, Kenneth W., ed. 2002. Proceedings of the eleventh biennial southern silvicultural research conference. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–48. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 622 p.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Despite a large body of knowledge concerning the use of prescribed burning for wildlife management, amphibians and reptiles (collectively, herpetofauna) have received relatively little attention regarding their responses to fire. With few exceptions, previous studies of herpetofauna and prescribed burning have been confined to fire-maintained, pine-dominated ecosystems in the Coastal Plain of the southeastern United States. We initiated a study to examine effects of prescribed burning on herpetofauna in Piedmont upland hardwood stands. Linear drift fence arrays with pitfall traps were installed within control and treatment plots to assess effects of burn treatments through analysis of species captures. Treatment plots were subjected to low intensity winter and growing season fire. The initial prescribed burn treatments were implemented in February and March (1999) while the second prescribed burn treatments were implemented in April (2000). All treatment plots were burned with strip head fires set 10-20 feet apart resulting in flame lengths averaging less than 1 foot. Direct searching and drift fence sampling immediately after each prescribed burn revealed 1) no evidence of direct herpetofaunal mortality, and 2) no evidence of emigration from burn plots. Statistical analysis of data through the installation of the second burn (May 1999 through April 2000) revealed no significant difference between burned and unburned treatments for abundance, richness (S), diversity (H’), or evenness (J’)(P > 0.1) of the herpetofaunal community. 1Graduate Research Assistant, Professor, Assistant Professor, School of Natural Resources, Department of Forest Resources, 261 Lehotsky Hall, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634-0331; Wildlife Research Biologist, Willamette Industries, Inc., Coast Operations, P.O. Box 488, Dallas, Oregon 97338-0488; Assistant Professor, Department of Forestry, North Carolina State University, Box 8003, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8003, respectively. Citation for proceedings: Outcalt, Kenneth W., ed. 2002. Proceedings of the eleventh biennial southern silvicultural research conference. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–48. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 622 p.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Despite a large body of knowledge concerning the use of prescribed burning for wildlife management, amphibians and reptiles (collectively, herpetofauna) have received relatively little attention regarding their responses to fire. With few exceptions, previous studies of herpetofauna and prescribed burning have been confined to fire-maintained, pine-dominated ecosystems in the Coastal Plain of the southeastern United States. We initiated a study to examine effects of prescribed burning on herpetofauna in Piedmont upland hardwood stands. Linear drift fence arrays with pitfall traps were installed within control and treatment plots to assess effects of burn treatments through analysis of species captures. Treatment plots were subjected to low intensity winter and growing season fire. The initial prescribed burn treatments were implemented in February and March (1999) while the second prescribed burn treatments were implemented in April (2000). All treatment plots were burned with strip head fires set 10-20 feet apart resulting in flame lengths averaging less than 1 foot. Direct searching and drift fence sampling immediately after each prescribed burn revealed 1) no evidence of direct herpetofaunal mortality, and 2) no evidence of emigration from burn plots. Statistical analysis of data through the installation of the second burn (May 1999 through April 2000) revealed no significant difference between burned and unburned treatments for abundance, richness (S), diversity (H’), or evenness (J’)(P > 0.1) of the herpetofaunal community. 1Graduate Research Assistant, Professor, Assistant Professor, School of Natural Resources, Department of Forest Resources, 261 Lehotsky Hall, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634-0331; Wildlife Research Biologist, Willamette Industries, Inc., Coast Operations, P.O. Box 488, Dallas, Oregon 97338-0488; Assistant Professor, Department of Forestry, North Carolina State University, Box 8003, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8003, respectively. Citation for proceedings: Outcalt, Kenneth W., ed. 2002. Proceedings of the eleventh biennial southern silvicultural research conference. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–48. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 622 p.

Key concepts: Prescribed burn, Wildlife, Forestry, Geography, Ecology, Environmental science, Species richness, Blackwater

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of Prescribed Fire on Herpetofauna Within Hardwood Forests of the Upper Piedmont of South Carolina: A Preliminary Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens