1994•PubMedRequires access

A comparison of pulmonary functions and oxygenation following local, spinal or general anaesthesia in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.

Hadar J. Merhav, Harry Rothstein, Abraham Eliraz, Renato A. Hana, Reuven A. Pfeffermann

Open publisher page 28 citations

Abstract

In order to compare the pulmonary effects of various anaesthetic techniques, 49 otherwise healthy patients needing inguinal hernia repair were randomized to general, spinal or local anaesthesia. Blood gases were drawn and spirometry performed pre- and postoperatively at fixed intervals. Results showed a superior ventilation and oxygenation pattern for local anaesthesia (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups with respect to forced vital capacity (FVC) or forced expiratory volume per second (FEV1) but patients who had spinal anaesthesia performed worse, and for the group as a whole there was a significant reduction compared to preoperative values. We conclude that local anaesthesia is less detrimental to pulmonary function in inguinal hernia operations than spinal or general anaesthesia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In order to compare the pulmonary effects of various anaesthetic techniques, 49 otherwise healthy patients needing inguinal hernia repair were randomized to general, spinal or local anaesthesia. Blood gases were drawn and spirometry performed pre- and postoperatively at fixed intervals. Results showed a superior ventilation and oxygenation pattern for local anaesthesia (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups with respect to forced vital capacity (FVC) or forced expiratory volume per second (FEV1) but patients who had spinal anaesthesia performed worse, and for the group as a whole there was a significant reduction compared to preoperative values. We conclude that local anaesthesia is less detrimental to pulmonary function in inguinal hernia operations than spinal or general anaesthesia.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In order to compare the pulmonary effects of various anaesthetic techniques, 49 otherwise healthy patients needing inguinal hernia repair were randomized to general, spinal or local anaesthesia. Blood gases were drawn and spirometry performed pre- and postoperatively at fixed intervals. Results showed a superior ventilation and oxygenation pattern for local anaesthesia (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups with respect to forced vital capacity (FVC) or forced expiratory volume per second (FEV1) but patients who had spinal anaesthesia performed worse, and for the group as a whole there was a significant reduction compared to preoperative values. We conclude that local anaesthesia is less detrimental to pulmonary function in inguinal hernia operations than spinal or general anaesthesia.

Key concepts: Medicine, Anesthesia, Spirometry, General anaesthesia, Vital capacity, Inguinal hernia, Spinal anesthesia, Ventilation (architecture)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparison of pulmonary functions and oxygenation following local, spinal or general anaesthesia in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. — Research Paper | ScholarLens