2007•PubMedRequires access

[Clinical effect of induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies after deceased-donor kidney transplantation (an experience from Vilnius Center)].

Tatjana Rainienė, Rasa Dobrovolskienė, Balys Dainys, Genadijus Kučinskis, A. Želvys

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

We aimed at evaluating the impact of monoclonal antibodies on immune response against deceased-donor kidney transplant: the frequency and severity of acute rejection episodes during first 3 months after transplantation and graft loss rate at one year. The frequency of infectious complications during the first 6 months after transplantation and patient survival rate during one year were also analyzed. Our study included 187 deceased-donor renal transplants performed in Santariskes Clinics of Vilnius University Hospital from January 2000 to December 2004. Study group (Group 1) consisted of 66 patients who received additional induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies (31 patients treated with basiliximab and 35 patients treated with daclizumab); 121 patients in control group (Group 2) were treated only with conventional immunosuppression. Both groups received maintenance immunosuppressive therapy including cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Patient and graft survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. There were no significant differences in the age of patients, HLA mismatches, percentages of highly sensitized patients (panel-reactive antibody level more than 50%), and repeated transplantation between both groups. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection during the first 3 months after transplantation was significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (15.2% vs. 28.1%, P<0.05). There were no significant differences in patient survival rates (95.5% vs. 90.1%) between two groups at one year, but graft survival rate was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (94.0% vs. 77.0%, P<0.05). The proportion of patients with infectious complications during the first 6 months after transplantation was significantly lower in study group than in control group (33.3% vs. 49.6%, P<0.05). Therefore, induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies reduced the incidence and severity of acute rejection in early period after transplantation and led to higher graft survival rate. The lower frequency of infectious complications was observed in patients receiving induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We aimed at evaluating the impact of monoclonal antibodies on immune response against deceased-donor kidney transplant: the frequency and severity of acute rejection episodes during first 3 months after transplantation and graft loss rate at one year. The frequency of infectious complications during the first 6 months after transplantation and patient survival rate during one year were also analyzed. Our study included 187 deceased-donor renal transplants performed in Santariskes Clinics of Vilnius University Hospital from January 2000 to December 2004. Study group (Group 1) consisted of 66 patients who received additional induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies (31 patients treated with basiliximab and 35 patients treated with daclizumab); 121 patients in control group (Group 2) were treated only with conventional immunosuppression. Both groups received maintenance immunosuppressive therapy including cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Patient and graft survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. There were no significant differences in the age of patients, HLA mismatches, percentages of highly sensitized patients (panel-reactive antibody level more than 50%), and repeated transplantation between both groups. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection during the first 3 months after transplantation was significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (15.2% vs. 28.1%, P<0.05). There were no significant differences in patient survival rates (95.5% vs. 90.1%) between two groups at one year, but graft survival rate was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (94.0% vs. 77.0%, P<0.05). The proportion of patients with infectious complications during the first 6 months after transplantation was significantly lower in study group than in control group (33.3% vs. 49.6%, P<0.05). Therefore, induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies reduced the incidence and severity of acute rejection in early period after transplantation and led to higher graft survival rate. The lower frequency of infectious complications was observed in patients receiving induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We aimed at evaluating the impact of monoclonal antibodies on immune response against deceased-donor kidney transplant: the frequency and severity of acute rejection episodes during first 3 months after transplantation and graft loss rate at one year. The frequency of infectious complications during the first 6 months after transplantation and patient survival rate during one year were also analyzed. Our study included 187 deceased-donor renal transplants performed in Santariskes Clinics of Vilnius University Hospital from January 2000 to December 2004. Study group (Group 1) consisted of 66 patients who received additional induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies (31 patients treated with basiliximab and 35 patients treated with daclizumab); 121 patients in control group (Group 2) were treated only with conventional immunosuppression. Both groups received maintenance immunosuppressive therapy including cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Patient and graft survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. There were no significant differences in the age of patients, HLA mismatches, percentages of highly sensitized patients (panel-reactive antibody level more than 50%), and repeated transplantation between both groups. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection during the first 3 months after transplantation was significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (15.2% vs. 28.1%, P<0.05). There were no significant differences in patient survival rates (95.5% vs. 90.1%) between two groups at one year, but graft survival rate was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (94.0% vs. 77.0%, P<0.05). The proportion of patients with infectious complications during the first 6 months after transplantation was significantly lower in study group than in control group (33.3% vs. 49.6%, P<0.05). Therefore, induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies reduced the incidence and severity of acute rejection in early period after transplantation and led to higher graft survival rate. The lower frequency of infectious complications was observed in patients receiving induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies.

Key concepts: Daclizumab, Medicine, Basiliximab, Immunosuppression, Transplantation, Panel reactive antibody, Surgery, Kidney transplantation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Clinical effect of induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies after deceased-donor kidney transplantation (an experience from Vilnius Center)]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens