2014PubMedRequires access

[Comparison of HbA1c and oral glucose tolerance test for diagnosing diabetes].

Shue Huang, Jian Zhang, Liping Meng, Pengkun Song, Qingqing Man, Lixiang Li, Chunrong Wang, Ping Fu, Shanshan Jia

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in diagnosing diabetes and pre-diabetes in the general population. METHODS: A total of 1416 subjects from Nanchang, Jiangxi Province and Wuhan, Hubei Province who have participated the 2010 Chinese Nutrition and Health Survey were studied and their HbA1c were measured. The glycemic levels and distribution of the subjects diagnosed with diabetes and pre-diabetes by OGTT and HbA1c were compared. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of HbA1c in detecting diabetes as defined by OGTT. RESULTS: According to the 1999 WHO criteria, 86 subjects were diagnosed with diabetes and 262 were with pre-diabetes. Comparing with OGTT, the sensitivity and specificity of HbA1c > or = 6.5% was 41.9% and 98.9%. Subjects with diabetes diagnosed by HbA1c and OGTT were not consistent, and they have different HbA1c level. The HbA1c level of 5.7% - 6.4% was associated with a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 55.1% in detecting impaired glucose regulation (IGR). Cases with pre-diabetes identified by HbA1c 5.7% - 6.4% were different from those with IGR. They had lower fasting glucose and 2-hour plasma glucose after glucose load than those with IGR. CONCLUSION: Among this studied population, HbA1c > or = 6.5% showed high specificity but low sensitivity for detecting glucose-defined diabetes. The performance of HbA1c of 5.7% -6.4% in screening pre-diabetes is poor.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in diagnosing diabetes and pre-diabetes in the general population. METHODS: A total of 1416 subjects from Nanchang, Jiangxi Province and Wuhan, Hubei Province who have participated the 2010 Chinese Nutrition and Health Survey were studied and their HbA1c were measured. The glycemic levels and distribution of the subjects diagnosed with diabetes and pre-diabetes by OGTT and HbA1c were compared. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of HbA1c in detecting diabetes as defined by OGTT. RESULTS: According to the 1999 WHO criteria, 86 subjects were diagnosed with diabetes and 262 were with pre-diabetes. Comparing with OGTT, the sensitivity and specificity of HbA1c > or = 6.5% was 41.9% and 98.9%. Subjects with diabetes diagnosed by HbA1c and OGTT were not consistent, and they have different HbA1c level. The HbA1c level of 5.7% - 6.4% was associated with a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 55.1% in detecting impaired glucose regulation (IGR). Cases with pre-diabetes identified by HbA1c 5.7% - 6.4% were different from those with IGR. They had lower fasting glucose and 2-hour plasma glucose after glucose load than those with IGR. CONCLUSION: Among this studied population, HbA1c > or = 6.5% showed high specificity but low sensitivity for detecting glucose-defined diabetes. The performance of HbA1c of 5.7% -6.4% in screening pre-diabetes is poor.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in diagnosing diabetes and pre-diabetes in the general population. METHODS: A total of 1416 subjects from Nanchang, Jiangxi Province and Wuhan, Hubei Province who have participated the 2010 Chinese Nutrition and Health Survey were studied and their HbA1c were measured. The glycemic levels and distribution of the subjects diagnosed with diabetes and pre-diabetes by OGTT and HbA1c were compared. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of HbA1c in detecting diabetes as defined by OGTT. RESULTS: According to the 1999 WHO criteria, 86 subjects were diagnosed with diabetes and 262 were with pre-diabetes. Comparing with OGTT, the sensitivity and specificity of HbA1c > or = 6.5% was 41.9% and 98.9%. Subjects with diabetes diagnosed by HbA1c and OGTT were not consistent, and they have different HbA1c level. The HbA1c level of 5.7% - 6.4% was associated with a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 55.1% in detecting impaired glucose regulation (IGR). Cases with pre-diabetes identified by HbA1c 5.7% - 6.4% were different from those with IGR. They had lower fasting glucose and 2-hour plasma glucose after glucose load than those with IGR. CONCLUSION: Among this studied population, HbA1c > or = 6.5% showed high specificity but low sensitivity for detecting glucose-defined diabetes. The performance of HbA1c of 5.7% -6.4% in screening pre-diabetes is poor.

Key concepts: Diabetes mellitus, Medicine, Glycated hemoglobin, Glycemic, Internal medicine, Glucose tolerance test, Population, Hemoglobin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparison of HbA1c and oral glucose tolerance test for diagnosing diabetes]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens