1995•OrthopedicsRequires access

THE ROLE OF A COMPOSITE, DEMINERALIZED BONE MATRIX AND BONE MARROW IN THE TREATMENT OF OSSEOUS DEFECTS

J J Tiedeman, Kevin L. Garvin, Todd A. Kile, John F. Connolly

Open publisher page 166 citations

Abstract

The efficacy of demineralized bone matrix (DBM) used alone and with bone marrow as a graft material in the treatment of osseous defects was evaluated in 48 patients. Of these 48 patients, 39 were available to follow up and review. Follow up averaged 19 months for all patients. In the entire series, 30 of 39 patients demonstrated osseous union for a 77% success rate. Patients with fracture nonunion represented the most recalcitrant group clinically, with union achieved in only 61% of these cases. Overall, the 39 patients grafted with DBM demonstrated healing that was comparable to results achieved with standard iliac crest bone graft. The results indicate the DBM and marrow composite grafting is a suitable alternative to autologous iliac crest bone graft for use in certain clinical situations, such as bone defects in children, comminuted fractures with associated bone loss, nonunited fractures, or to augment an intended arthrodesis site.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The efficacy of demineralized bone matrix (DBM) used alone and with bone marrow as a graft material in the treatment of osseous defects was evaluated in 48 patients. Of these 48 patients, 39 were available to follow up and review. Follow up averaged 19 months for all patients. In the entire series, 30 of 39 patients demonstrated osseous union for a 77% success rate. Patients with fracture nonunion represented the most recalcitrant group clinically, with union achieved in only 61% of these cases. Overall, the 39 patients grafted with DBM demonstrated healing that was comparable to results achieved with standard iliac crest bone graft. The results indicate the DBM and marrow composite grafting is a suitable alternative to autologous iliac crest bone graft for use in certain clinical situations, such as bone defects in children, comminuted fractures with associated bone loss, nonunited fractures, or to augment an intended arthrodesis site.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 166 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The efficacy of demineralized bone matrix (DBM) used alone and with bone marrow as a graft material in the treatment of osseous defects was evaluated in 48 patients. Of these 48 patients, 39 were available to follow up and review. Follow up averaged 19 months for all patients. In the entire series, 30 of 39 patients demonstrated osseous union for a 77% success rate. Patients with fracture nonunion represented the most recalcitrant group clinically, with union achieved in only 61% of these cases. Overall, the 39 patients grafted with DBM demonstrated healing that was comparable to results achieved with standard iliac crest bone graft. The results indicate the DBM and marrow composite grafting is a suitable alternative to autologous iliac crest bone graft for use in certain clinical situations, such as bone defects in children, comminuted fractures with associated bone loss, nonunited fractures, or to augment an intended arthrodesis site.

Key concepts: Demineralized bone matrix, Medicine, Iliac crest, Nonunion, dBm, Bone marrow aspirate, Surgery, Arthrodesis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE ROLE OF A COMPOSITE, DEMINERALIZED BONE MATRIX AND BONE MARROW IN THE TREATMENT OF OSSEOUS DEFECTS — Research Paper | ScholarLens