1996PubMedRequires access

[Evaluation of bones using quantitative ultrasonography].

Krieg Ma, D. Thiébaud, Michel D. Landry, P. Burckhardt

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

The evaluation of bone by ultrasound is a new, transportable and non-irradiating method. It measures attenuation of ultrasound (BUA), as well as velocity (SOS) of ultrasound in a given tissue. For the measurement of bone, the most frequently used bone is the calcaneus. We have used this technique (Achilles, Lunar) to evaluate the reproducibility of measurements in healthy volunteers and to determine the correlations between the results of ultrasound measurements and those of conventional densitometry (DXA) in a population of postmenopausal females who consulted for screening or diagnosis of osteoporosis. Although several publications have already dealt with the same questions, it is important to reexamine them locally before the technique is uncritically used even in unspecialized centers. The coefficients of variation corresponded to that reported by others: 1.8% for BUA and 0.3% for SOS. The correlations between the ultrasound measurements and the results of DXA at lumbar spine, femoral neck and calcaneus in 57 postmenopausal women aged +/- 59 (43-78) years and in part osteoporotic (DXA results below 2.5 SD-T-score) (Hologic QDR 2000) were all significant (p < 0.001). The best correlation between the two techniques (DEXA and ultrasound) is found when applied to the same site, i.e. the calcaneus (r > 0.8). These results also agree with the literature. Low ultrasound values (BUA < 100 dB/MHz, SOS < 1495 m/s) are highly suggestive of osteoporosis, while high ultrasound values are almost exclusively found in non-osteoporotic women. This information provides the basis for further investigations, such as correlation with fracture risk, in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The evaluation of bone by ultrasound is a new, transportable and non-irradiating method. It measures attenuation of ultrasound (BUA), as well as velocity (SOS) of ultrasound in a given tissue. For the measurement of bone, the most frequently used bone is the calcaneus. We have used this technique (Achilles, Lunar) to evaluate the reproducibility of measurements in healthy volunteers and to determine the correlations between the results of ultrasound measurements and those of conventional densitometry (DXA) in a population of postmenopausal females who consulted for screening or diagnosis of osteoporosis. Although several publications have already dealt with the same questions, it is important to reexamine them locally before the technique is uncritically used even in unspecialized centers. The coefficients of variation corresponded to that reported by others: 1.8% for BUA and 0.3% for SOS. The correlations between the ultrasound measurements and the results of DXA at lumbar spine, femoral neck and calcaneus in 57 postmenopausal women aged +/- 59 (43-78) years and in part osteoporotic (DXA results below 2.5 SD-T-score) (Hologic QDR 2000) were all significant (p < 0.001). The best correlation between the two techniques (DEXA and ultrasound) is found when applied to the same site, i.e. the calcaneus (r > 0.8). These results also agree with the literature. Low ultrasound values (BUA < 100 dB/MHz, SOS < 1495 m/s) are highly suggestive of osteoporosis, while high ultrasound values are almost exclusively found in non-osteoporotic women. This information provides the basis for further investigations, such as correlation with fracture risk, in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The evaluation of bone by ultrasound is a new, transportable and non-irradiating method. It measures attenuation of ultrasound (BUA), as well as velocity (SOS) of ultrasound in a given tissue. For the measurement of bone, the most frequently used bone is the calcaneus. We have used this technique (Achilles, Lunar) to evaluate the reproducibility of measurements in healthy volunteers and to determine the correlations between the results of ultrasound measurements and those of conventional densitometry (DXA) in a population of postmenopausal females who consulted for screening or diagnosis of osteoporosis. Although several publications have already dealt with the same questions, it is important to reexamine them locally before the technique is uncritically used even in unspecialized centers. The coefficients of variation corresponded to that reported by others: 1.8% for BUA and 0.3% for SOS. The correlations between the ultrasound measurements and the results of DXA at lumbar spine, femoral neck and calcaneus in 57 postmenopausal women aged +/- 59 (43-78) years and in part osteoporotic (DXA results below 2.5 SD-T-score) (Hologic QDR 2000) were all significant (p < 0.001). The best correlation between the two techniques (DEXA and ultrasound) is found when applied to the same site, i.e. the calcaneus (r > 0.8). These results also agree with the literature. Low ultrasound values (BUA < 100 dB/MHz, SOS < 1495 m/s) are highly suggestive of osteoporosis, while high ultrasound values are almost exclusively found in non-osteoporotic women. This information provides the basis for further investigations, such as correlation with fracture risk, in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.

Key concepts: Medicine, Calcaneus, Densitometry, Ultrasound, Osteoporosis, Nuclear medicine, Femoral neck, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Evaluation of bones using quantitative ultrasonography]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens