[Event-related potential P300 in cerebral infarction].
Tang Xf
Abstract
Tang Xf
Abstract
N1, P2 and P300 potentials were studied in 20 cases of cerebral infarction and 47 healthy controls with standard technique of auditory event-related potentials. Healthy controls of both sexes, different ages, education levels and cognitive capacity did not show apparent differences in the latency of p300 (P greater than 0.05, respectively). The patient group, however, revealed significant (P less than 0.001) prolongation of latency of P300 (mean = 409.6 +/- 50 ms) as compared with 28 well matched healthy subjects (mean = 337.7 +/- 24 ms). Although there was some decline of amplitude of P300 in the patient group, the difference between the control and patient groups was not significant (P greater than 0.05). There was significant difference in the Cognitive Capacity Screening Examination findings between the control and patient groups (P less than 0.01), but it seemed that the evaluation of latency of cognition-related p300 might be more objective and sensitive (P less than 0.001).
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
N1, P2 and P300 potentials were studied in 20 cases of cerebral infarction and 47 healthy controls with standard technique of auditory event-related potentials. Healthy controls of both sexes, different ages, education levels and cognitive capacity did not show apparent differences in the latency of p300 (P greater than 0.05, respectively). The patient group, however, revealed significant (P less than 0.001) prolongation of latency of P300 (mean = 409.6 +/- 50 ms) as compared with 28 well matched healthy subjects (mean = 337.7 +/- 24 ms). Although there was some decline of amplitude of P300 in the patient group, the difference between the control and patient groups was not significant (P greater than 0.05). There was significant difference in the Cognitive Capacity Screening Examination findings between the control and patient groups (P less than 0.01), but it seemed that the evaluation of latency of cognition-related p300 might be more objective and sensitive (P less than 0.001).
Key concepts: Event-related potential, Latency (audio), Cognition, Audiology, Cerebral infarction, Medicine, Significant difference, Internal medicine