1991•PubMedRequires access

[Event-related potential P300 in cerebral infarction].

Tang Xf

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

N1, P2 and P300 potentials were studied in 20 cases of cerebral infarction and 47 healthy controls with standard technique of auditory event-related potentials. Healthy controls of both sexes, different ages, education levels and cognitive capacity did not show apparent differences in the latency of p300 (P greater than 0.05, respectively). The patient group, however, revealed significant (P less than 0.001) prolongation of latency of P300 (mean = 409.6 +/- 50 ms) as compared with 28 well matched healthy subjects (mean = 337.7 +/- 24 ms). Although there was some decline of amplitude of P300 in the patient group, the difference between the control and patient groups was not significant (P greater than 0.05). There was significant difference in the Cognitive Capacity Screening Examination findings between the control and patient groups (P less than 0.01), but it seemed that the evaluation of latency of cognition-related p300 might be more objective and sensitive (P less than 0.001).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

N1, P2 and P300 potentials were studied in 20 cases of cerebral infarction and 47 healthy controls with standard technique of auditory event-related potentials. Healthy controls of both sexes, different ages, education levels and cognitive capacity did not show apparent differences in the latency of p300 (P greater than 0.05, respectively). The patient group, however, revealed significant (P less than 0.001) prolongation of latency of P300 (mean = 409.6 +/- 50 ms) as compared with 28 well matched healthy subjects (mean = 337.7 +/- 24 ms). Although there was some decline of amplitude of P300 in the patient group, the difference between the control and patient groups was not significant (P greater than 0.05). There was significant difference in the Cognitive Capacity Screening Examination findings between the control and patient groups (P less than 0.01), but it seemed that the evaluation of latency of cognition-related p300 might be more objective and sensitive (P less than 0.001).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

N1, P2 and P300 potentials were studied in 20 cases of cerebral infarction and 47 healthy controls with standard technique of auditory event-related potentials. Healthy controls of both sexes, different ages, education levels and cognitive capacity did not show apparent differences in the latency of p300 (P greater than 0.05, respectively). The patient group, however, revealed significant (P less than 0.001) prolongation of latency of P300 (mean = 409.6 +/- 50 ms) as compared with 28 well matched healthy subjects (mean = 337.7 +/- 24 ms). Although there was some decline of amplitude of P300 in the patient group, the difference between the control and patient groups was not significant (P greater than 0.05). There was significant difference in the Cognitive Capacity Screening Examination findings between the control and patient groups (P less than 0.01), but it seemed that the evaluation of latency of cognition-related p300 might be more objective and sensitive (P less than 0.001).

Key concepts: Event-related potential, Latency (audio), Cognition, Audiology, Cerebral infarction, Medicine, Significant difference, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Event-related potential P300 in cerebral infarction]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens