[Recurrence of chronic duodenal ulcer following initial therapy with pirenzepine or cimetidine].
Enno Hentschel, K Schütze, W Dufek
Abstract
Enno Hentschel, K Schütze, W Dufek
Abstract
Recurrence rates of chronic duodenal ulcer after initial therapy with pirenzepine or cimetidine were investigated in a prospective, randomized trial with a total of 80 patients. After 12 weeks of therapy with pirenzepine (50 mg b.i.d) or cimetidine (200 mg t.i.d. + 400 mg nocte) 68,7% and 88,5% respectively were healed (chi 2 = 3,97; p less than 0,05). These patients showed recurrences in 73,6% after pirenzepine and in 84,6% after cimetidine during a six months observation period. This difference is not statistically significant, nor was life table analysis capable to show any difference in the relapse pattern between the two groups.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Recurrence rates of chronic duodenal ulcer after initial therapy with pirenzepine or cimetidine were investigated in a prospective, randomized trial with a total of 80 patients. After 12 weeks of therapy with pirenzepine (50 mg b.i.d) or cimetidine (200 mg t.i.d. + 400 mg nocte) 68,7% and 88,5% respectively were healed (chi 2 = 3,97; p less than 0,05). These patients showed recurrences in 73,6% after pirenzepine and in 84,6% after cimetidine during a six months observation period. This difference is not statistically significant, nor was life table analysis capable to show any difference in the relapse pattern between the two groups.
Key concepts: Pirenzepine, Cimetidine, Medicine, Duodenal ulcer, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Significant difference, Randomized controlled trial