2010•Journal of the American Pomological SocietyOpen access

Seed Set, Berry Weight, and Yield Interactions in the Highbush Blueberry Cultivars ( Vaccinium CorymbosumL.) ‘Bluecrop’ and ‘Duke’

Mark K. Ehlenfeldt, Robert B. Martin

Open full text 19 citations

Abstract

Yields and berry weights of two widely grown, commercial, highbush blueberry ( Vacciniumspp.) cultivars, ‘Bluecrop’ and ‘Duke’, were evaluated for three or more harvests every season over ten years, and seed set was determined at each harvest over the last four. Across 10 years, yield and berry weight had no significant correlation. Under our study conditions, the limitations of yield for ‘Bluecrop’ did not include pollination. In fact, pollination (expressed as seed/gram fresh weight) had an inverse relationship to yield. For the years in which replicated seed counts were made, we found, in general, that ‘Bluecrop’ berry weight and seed/fruit decreased linearly between Harvest 1 and Harvest 3, and berries with similar seed numbers varied in weight as much 39% among years. Hence, reduced berry weight was not necessarily due to poor pollination. For ‘Duke’, trends of berry weight and seed/fruit across harvests were inconsistent, but ‘Duke’ appeared to have sufficient environmental plasticity to produce fruit with increased berry weight between successive harvests given favorable inputs. For ‘Duke’, berries with similar seed numbers varied in weight as much as 86% among years. A cyclical yield variation was seen in ‘Duke’ that generally followed a high-medium-low pattern.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Yields and berry weights of two widely grown, commercial, highbush blueberry ( Vacciniumspp.) cultivars, ‘Bluecrop’ and ‘Duke’, were evaluated for three or more harvests every season over ten years, and seed set was determined at each harvest over the last four. Across 10 years, yield and berry weight had no significant correlation. Under our study conditions, the limitations of yield for ‘Bluecrop’ did not include pollination. In fact, pollination (expressed as seed/gram fresh weight) had an inverse relationship to yield. For the years in which replicated seed counts were made, we found, in general, that ‘Bluecrop’ berry weight and seed/fruit decreased linearly between Harvest 1 and Harvest 3, and berries with similar seed numbers varied in weight as much 39% among years. Hence, reduced berry weight was not necessarily due to poor pollination. For ‘Duke’, trends of berry weight and seed/fruit across harvests were inconsistent, but ‘Duke’ appeared to have sufficient environmental plasticity to produce fruit with increased berry weight between successive harvests given favorable inputs. For ‘Duke’, berries with similar seed numbers varied in weight as much as 86% among years. A cyclical yield variation was seen in ‘Duke’ that generally followed a high-medium-low pattern.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Yields and berry weights of two widely grown, commercial, highbush blueberry ( Vacciniumspp.) cultivars, ‘Bluecrop’ and ‘Duke’, were evaluated for three or more harvests every season over ten years, and seed set was determined at each harvest over the last four. Across 10 years, yield and berry weight had no significant correlation. Under our study conditions, the limitations of yield for ‘Bluecrop’ did not include pollination. In fact, pollination (expressed as seed/gram fresh weight) had an inverse relationship to yield. For the years in which replicated seed counts were made, we found, in general, that ‘Bluecrop’ berry weight and seed/fruit decreased linearly between Harvest 1 and Harvest 3, and berries with similar seed numbers varied in weight as much 39% among years. Hence, reduced berry weight was not necessarily due to poor pollination. For ‘Duke’, trends of berry weight and seed/fruit across harvests were inconsistent, but ‘Duke’ appeared to have sufficient environmental plasticity to produce fruit with increased berry weight between successive harvests given favorable inputs. For ‘Duke’, berries with similar seed numbers varied in weight as much as 86% among years. A cyclical yield variation was seen in ‘Duke’ that generally followed a high-medium-low pattern.

Key concepts: Berry, Biology, Vaccinium, Cultivar, Yield (engineering), Pollination, Ericaceae, Horticulture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Seed Set, Berry Weight, and Yield Interactions in the Highbush Blueberry Cultivars ( Vaccinium CorymbosumL.) ‘Bluecrop’ and ‘Duke’ — Research Paper | ScholarLens