ScholarLens Back to search
1996•International Journal of Clinical PracticeRequires access

AN AUDIT OF THE USE OF SPHYGMOMANOMETERS

Akbar Hussain, JGC Cox

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

This survey assessed the measurement of blood pressure and use of sphygmomanometers by general practitioners in Humberside and Yorkshire in 1988. All registered practitioners were sent a questionnaire--1223 (58%) returned it completed. Their responses showed that 269 (22%) had an aneroid sphygmomanometer only, and that 120 (10%) had a random zero sphygmomanometer; 700 (57%) had special cuffs for obese patients, and 558 (46%) had special cuffs for children; 228 (23.5%) had never had their sphygmomanometers serviced ('never' corresponding to a mean time of 5.75 years), while 23% had patients who measured their own blood pressure. These findings suggest that the British Hypertension Society's recommendations on servicing and cuff use are not always applied. A formal audit of the use of different types of sphygmomanometer in general practice may encourage and improve accuracy and uniformity in blood pressure recording.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This survey assessed the measurement of blood pressure and use of sphygmomanometers by general practitioners in Humberside and Yorkshire in 1988. All registered practitioners were sent a questionnaire--1223 (58%) returned it completed. Their responses showed that 269 (22%) had an aneroid sphygmomanometer only, and that 120 (10%) had a random zero sphygmomanometer; 700 (57%) had special cuffs for obese patients, and 558 (46%) had special cuffs for children; 228 (23.5%) had never had their sphygmomanometers serviced ('never' corresponding to a mean time of 5.75 years), while 23% had patients who measured their own blood pressure. These findings suggest that the British Hypertension Society's recommendations on servicing and cuff use are not always applied. A formal audit of the use of different types of sphygmomanometer in general practice may encourage and improve accuracy and uniformity in blood pressure recording.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This survey assessed the measurement of blood pressure and use of sphygmomanometers by general practitioners in Humberside and Yorkshire in 1988. All registered practitioners were sent a questionnaire--1223 (58%) returned it completed. Their responses showed that 269 (22%) had an aneroid sphygmomanometer only, and that 120 (10%) had a random zero sphygmomanometer; 700 (57%) had special cuffs for obese patients, and 558 (46%) had special cuffs for children; 228 (23.5%) had never had their sphygmomanometers serviced ('never' corresponding to a mean time of 5.75 years), while 23% had patients who measured their own blood pressure. These findings suggest that the British Hypertension Society's recommendations on servicing and cuff use are not always applied. A formal audit of the use of different types of sphygmomanometer in general practice may encourage and improve accuracy and uniformity in blood pressure recording.

Key concepts: Sphygmomanometer, Medicine, Blood pressure, Cuff, Audit, Physical therapy, Pediatrics, Surgery

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
AN AUDIT OF THE USE OF SPHYGMOMANOMETERS — Research Paper | ScholarLens