2003Humana Press eBooksRequires access

Measurement of TNF and iNOS mRNA Using cDNA-Equalized Reverse Transcriptase PCR

Jay K. Kolls, Jianming Xie

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Since the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for DNA amplification was first introduced in 1985 ( 1 ), the combination of reverse transcription with subsequent PCR amplification of the cDNA (RT-PCR) has been an increasingly utilized technique to analyze gene expression ( 2 , 3 ). In order for this procedure to be reasonably quantitative, however, appropriate controls must be applied to all steps, including the quantitation of the original RNA, the reverse transcription, and the PCR itself. Several investigators have published methods on quantitative RT-PCR that involve varying cDNA input into the PCR ( 3 – 7 ), varying cycle number ( 3 , 4 , 8 , 9 ), or the use of a competitive template as an internal standard ( 10 , 11 ). However, only a few of the competitive PCR methods take into account the efficency of the reverse transcription phase of RT-PCR ( 4 , 7 , 11 ), which may vary from 10-50% ( 12 , 13 ). In the former methods, it would also be necessary to amplify another control gene in parallel (e.g., actin) to control for RNA input and reverse transcription. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for DNA amplification was first introduced in 1985 ( 1 ), the combination of reverse transcription with subsequent PCR amplification of the cDNA (RT-PCR) has been an increasingly utilized technique to analyze gene expression ( 2 , 3 ). In order for this procedure to be reasonably quantitative, however, appropriate controls must be applied to all steps, including the quantitation of the original RNA, the reverse transcription, and the PCR itself. Several investigators have published methods on quantitative RT-PCR that involve varying cDNA input into the PCR ( 3 – 7 ), varying cycle number ( 3 , 4 , 8 , 9 ), or the use of a competitive template as an internal standard ( 10 , 11 ). However, only a few of the competitive PCR methods take into account the efficency of the reverse transcription phase of RT-PCR ( 4 , 7 , 11 ), which may vary from 10-50% ( 12 , 13 ). In the former methods, it would also be necessary to amplify another control gene in parallel (e.g., actin) to control for RNA input and reverse transcription. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for DNA amplification was first introduced in 1985 ( 1 ), the combination of reverse transcription with subsequent PCR amplification of the cDNA (RT-PCR) has been an increasingly utilized technique to analyze gene expression ( 2 , 3 ). In order for this procedure to be reasonably quantitative, however, appropriate controls must be applied to all steps, including the quantitation of the original RNA, the reverse transcription, and the PCR itself. Several investigators have published methods on quantitative RT-PCR that involve varying cDNA input into the PCR ( 3 – 7 ), varying cycle number ( 3 , 4 , 8 , 9 ), or the use of a competitive template as an internal standard ( 10 , 11 ). However, only a few of the competitive PCR methods take into account the efficency of the reverse transcription phase of RT-PCR ( 4 , 7 , 11 ), which may vary from 10-50% ( 12 , 13 ). In the former methods, it would also be necessary to amplify another control gene in parallel (e.g., actin) to control for RNA input and reverse transcription. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Reverse transcriptase, Complementary DNA, Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, Molecular biology, Biology, Rapid amplification of cDNA ends, Real-time polymerase chain reaction, Messenger RNA

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Measurement of TNF and iNOS mRNA Using cDNA-Equalized Reverse Transcriptase PCR — Research Paper | ScholarLens