1953JAMARequires access

SURGICAL ASPECTS OF PEPTIC ULCER

L R Dragstedt

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In the April 25, 1953, issue ofThe Journalis an editorial in which surgical aspects of peptic ulcer are discussed. This editorial was based on the report of a committee of the Gastroenterological Association.1A major conclusion of the report was as follows: "The results following partial gastric resection alone were superior to those following vagotomy with gastroenterostomy... for duodenal ulcer." In June, 1953, there appeared inGastroenterologya statement on errata, corrected tables, and an important modification of interpretation of the report by the committee.2Its conclusion now reads: "It is now apparent that the advantage of gastric resection for duodenal ulcer over gastroenterostomy and vagotomy is shown only if there is an estimated resection of more than 70 per cent of the stomach." This statement was published in answer to a critique3by Dr. Keith S. Grimson and in response to questions raised by

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the April 25, 1953, issue ofThe Journalis an editorial in which surgical aspects of peptic ulcer are discussed. This editorial was based on the report of a committee of the Gastroenterological Association.1A major conclusion of the report was as follows: "The results following partial gastric resection alone were superior to those following vagotomy with gastroenterostomy... for duodenal ulcer." In June, 1953, there appeared inGastroenterologya statement on errata, corrected tables, and an important modification of interpretation of the report by the committee.2Its conclusion now reads: "It is now apparent that the advantage of gastric resection for duodenal ulcer over gastroenterostomy and vagotomy is shown only if there is an estimated resection of more than 70 per cent of the stomach." This statement was published in answer to a critique3by Dr. Keith S. Grimson and in response to questions raised by

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the April 25, 1953, issue ofThe Journalis an editorial in which surgical aspects of peptic ulcer are discussed. This editorial was based on the report of a committee of the Gastroenterological Association.1A major conclusion of the report was as follows: "The results following partial gastric resection alone were superior to those following vagotomy with gastroenterostomy... for duodenal ulcer." In June, 1953, there appeared inGastroenterologya statement on errata, corrected tables, and an important modification of interpretation of the report by the committee.2Its conclusion now reads: "It is now apparent that the advantage of gastric resection for duodenal ulcer over gastroenterostomy and vagotomy is shown only if there is an estimated resection of more than 70 per cent of the stomach." This statement was published in answer to a critique3by Dr. Keith S. Grimson and in response to questions raised by

Key concepts: Peptic ulcer, Peptic, General surgery, Medicine, Business, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SURGICAL ASPECTS OF PEPTIC ULCER — Research Paper | ScholarLens